【新唐人2013年03月28日訊】中國大陸自2011年起已經連續三年「維穩費用超過軍費」。不過在所謂的官方預算當中，並沒有「維穩開支」這一說法，最接近的是「公共安全預算」。25號，大陸財政部網站公布今年度中央財政預算，其中「公共安全預算1,289億」，武警佔1,006億。分析指出，對中共政權來說，它最大的威脅不是外來的侵略，而是中國人民。同時，中共用於維穩的龐大投入，已經成了中國人民頭上的一個天大包袱。
財政部網站公布的2013年中央財政預算中，「公共安全預算」為1,289.89億元，比2012年實際執行的支出數字增加106.43億元，增長9%。而在今年的「公共安全預算」中，武裝警察預算為1,006.34億元，比去年實際執行的支出增加了92.96億元，增長10.2%。同時，今年的公安預算為143.55億元，比去年的支出增加了10.39億元，增長7.8%。
「英國廣播公司」《BBC》查看中國大陸財政部提交的《關於2012年中央和地方預算執行情況與2013年中央和地方預算草案報告》，發現報告正文中只提到今年度的「公共安全支出」預算為2029.37億元，增長7.9%。在附表11當中，「公共安全」一欄顯示「2012年執行數目為7,077億元」，「2013 年預算數目為7,690億元」。
美國「南卡羅萊納大學艾肯商學院」教授謝田表示，預算報告正文提出今年將支出2,029億元在「公共安全」上，但實際卻是1,289億，可以看出，中國的財政預算有很大的隨意性和隨機性。謝田說，預算差距這麼大，一個正常的國家，是沒法運作的。
美國「南卡羅萊納大學艾肯商學院」教授謝田：「中共政府，在涉及到公共所謂的公共安全，也就是他們自己的所謂維穩方面，實際上這個預算的數據是有很大的水分的，隨意的增加、減少，或者甚至造假。」
謝田指出，中國的維穩經費，已經連續多年超過軍費，對中共政權來說，它最大的威脅，不是所謂的外來侵略，而是中國人民。
謝田：「就是中國共產黨，實際上已經完全跟中國人民對立，並且把維穩，就是用高壓手段，強制和暴力的手段來鎮壓人民。」
時事評論員林子旭則表示，「公共安全預算」和中共每年的實際「維穩支出」，有著非常大的差距，如此龐大的數字，中共絕不敢拿到桌面上講。
時事評論員林子旭：「現在中共的統治危機四伏，維穩費用可以說就是一個無底洞，中共對此根本就無法作出準確預估。與此同時，整個中共維穩系統的人員，捏住了中共怕死的這個軟肋，瘋狂的在這裡面腐敗，十萬元能搞定的事情，這些人要一百萬，沒有甚麼事情的時候，這些人也會製造事端來要錢，這樣一來中共的維穩支出，必然是越來越大。」
《德國之聲》的評論文章指出，中國安全開支驚人的另一個主要原因是，負責「維穩」的公安及政法委系統誇大維穩難度，炮製出越來越多的「假想敵」，假借維護「國家安全」的名義，獲取更多的經費。
謝田：「中國（中共）的所謂維穩並不是維護公共安全，它實際上是維護共產黨的利益集團，而政法委在中國維穩的花費，我們從過去的十幾年鎮壓法輪功就知道了，它實際上，是沒有上限的。維穩對他們來說，實際上是完全沒有上線，予取予奪，願意用多少就用多少。」
謝田指出，可以看出，中共的維穩，包括預算數字前後不一，和真實數字的龐大性，已經成了中國經濟的一個巨大腫瘤，也是中國人民頭上的一個天大包袱。謝田認為，這也是中共政權對中國人民犯下的一個重罪。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/李勇
Chinese People's Huge Burden
Since 2011, Mainland China's"stability maintenance"
spending has been more than its military spending.
However, stability maintenance expenses
do not officially exist.
The closest thing to it is the" public safety budget."
On 25th March, the Ministry of Finance website published
the central budget for this year.
It stated, a public safety budget of 128.9 billion Yuan,
in which armed police accounted for 100.6 billion Yuan.
Analysts pointed out that the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) considers the Chinese people its biggest threat instead of foreign aggression.
At the same time, the CCP's huge investment for maintenance
of stability has become a huge burden for the Chinese people.
A public safety budget of 128.9 billion Yuan shows
an increase of 10.6 billion yuan,
a 9% increase over the actual expenditure figure in 2012.
This year's budget for armed police of 100.6 billion shows
an increase of 10.2% compared to 929.6 billion for last year.
At the same time, the public security budget for this year
shows an increase of 7.8% more than last year's actual expenditure.
"BBC" found, from central and local budget reports
submitted by the Ministry of Finance,
that the public safety expenditures budget of 202.937 billion
Yuan for 2013, was an increase of 7.9% from 2012.
However, in the supplemental reports, the "public safety"
column shows 707.7 billion for 2012 and 769 billion for 2013.
Professor Xie Tian, at University of South Carolina
Aiken Business School said that
the budget report proposed expenditure of 202.9 billion
on public safety, but it is actually 128.9 billion Yuan.
This shows that there is a lot of room for randomness.
Xie Tian said, such a huge gap in the budget will not
happen in a normal country.
Professor Xie Tian: "Regarding public safety,
the CCP is talking about their own safety.
There is a lot of flexibility within the budget.
That means they can increase it, decrease it,
or even make things up."
Xie Tian pointed out that for years, China's stability
maintenance spending has surpassed the military spending.
For the CCP, its biggest threat is not foreign aggression,
but the Chinese people.
Xie Tian: "That means the CCP chooses to confront
people, and is using iron-handed, coercive and violent means to suppress the Chinese people."
Political commentator Lin Zixu said, the public safety budget
is far more than the stability maintenance expenditure.
It shows such a large difference that the CCP
is afraid to openly address it.
Lin Zixu: "Under CCP rule, there are crises everywhere.
Stability maintenance spending can be a bottomless pit.
The CCP has no way to give an accurate estimate.
At the same time, corrupt officials find
this loophole and get rich.
A job costing 100,000 yuan can easily turn into one million.
When the whole world is at peace, they create chaos.
Therefore, the CCP's maintenance expenditures
are getting bigger and bigger every year."
"Deutsche Welle" pointed out that the main reason
for China's safety spending is the Ministry of Public Security
and the Politics and Law Committee like to exaggerate and
concoct a growing number of "imaginary enemies",
under the guise of safeguarding national security
to obtain more funding.
Xie Tian: "The CCP's stability maintenance
is not for public safety.
It is actually to safeguard the interests Group of the CCP.
Judging by the persecution of Falun Gong from the past
ten years, we know that funding for the Political and
Law Committee has had no upper limit—
it gets whatever it needs."
Xie Tian points out that the CCP's stability maintenance
shows inconsistent budget figures, which have turned into a huge economic tumor.
That is also a great burden for the Chinese people.
Xie Tian believes that the CCP has committed
a crime against the Chinese people.
財政部網站公布的2013年中央財政預算中，「公共安全預算」為1,289.89億元，比2012年實際執行的支出數字增加106.43億元，增長9%。而在今年的「公共安全預算」中，武裝警察預算為1,006.34億元，比去年實際執行的支出增加了92.96億元，增長10.2%。同時，今年的公安預算為143.55億元，比去年的支出增加了10.39億元，增長7.8%。
「英國廣播公司」《BBC》查看中國大陸財政部提交的《關於2012年中央和地方預算執行情況與2013年中央和地方預算草案報告》，發現報告正文中只提到今年度的「公共安全支出」預算為2029.37億元，增長7.9%。在附表11當中，「公共安全」一欄顯示「2012年執行數目為7,077億元」，「2013 年預算數目為7,690億元」。
美國「南卡羅萊納大學艾肯商學院」教授謝田表示，預算報告正文提出今年將支出2,029億元在「公共安全」上，但實際卻是1,289億，可以看出，中國的財政預算有很大的隨意性和隨機性。謝田說，預算差距這麼大，一個正常的國家，是沒法運作的。
美國「南卡羅萊納大學艾肯商學院」教授謝田：「中共政府，在涉及到公共所謂的公共安全，也就是他們自己的所謂維穩方面，實際上這個預算的數據是有很大的水分的，隨意的增加、減少，或者甚至造假。」
謝田指出，中國的維穩經費，已經連續多年超過軍費，對中共政權來說，它最大的威脅，不是所謂的外來侵略，而是中國人民。
謝田：「就是中國共產黨，實際上已經完全跟中國人民對立，並且把維穩，就是用高壓手段，強制和暴力的手段來鎮壓人民。」
時事評論員林子旭則表示，「公共安全預算」和中共每年的實際「維穩支出」，有著非常大的差距，如此龐大的數字，中共絕不敢拿到桌面上講。
時事評論員林子旭：「現在中共的統治危機四伏，維穩費用可以說就是一個無底洞，中共對此根本就無法作出準確預估。與此同時，整個中共維穩系統的人員，捏住了中共怕死的這個軟肋，瘋狂的在這裡面腐敗，十萬元能搞定的事情，這些人要一百萬，沒有甚麼事情的時候，這些人也會製造事端來要錢，這樣一來中共的維穩支出，必然是越來越大。」
《德國之聲》的評論文章指出，中國安全開支驚人的另一個主要原因是，負責「維穩」的公安及政法委系統誇大維穩難度，炮製出越來越多的「假想敵」，假借維護「國家安全」的名義，獲取更多的經費。
謝田：「中國（中共）的所謂維穩並不是維護公共安全，它實際上是維護共產黨的利益集團，而政法委在中國維穩的花費，我們從過去的十幾年鎮壓法輪功就知道了，它實際上，是沒有上限的。維穩對他們來說，實際上是完全沒有上線，予取予奪，願意用多少就用多少。」
謝田指出，可以看出，中共的維穩，包括預算數字前後不一，和真實數字的龐大性，已經成了中國經濟的一個巨大腫瘤，也是中國人民頭上的一個天大包袱。謝田認為，這也是中共政權對中國人民犯下的一個重罪。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/李勇
Chinese People's Huge Burden
Since 2011, Mainland China's"stability maintenance"
spending has been more than its military spending.
However, stability maintenance expenses
do not officially exist.
The closest thing to it is the" public safety budget."
On 25th March, the Ministry of Finance website published
the central budget for this year.
It stated, a public safety budget of 128.9 billion Yuan,
in which armed police accounted for 100.6 billion Yuan.
Analysts pointed out that the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) considers the Chinese people its biggest threat instead of foreign aggression.
At the same time, the CCP's huge investment for maintenance
of stability has become a huge burden for the Chinese people.
A public safety budget of 128.9 billion Yuan shows
an increase of 10.6 billion yuan,
a 9% increase over the actual expenditure figure in 2012.
This year's budget for armed police of 100.6 billion shows
an increase of 10.2% compared to 929.6 billion for last year.
At the same time, the public security budget for this year
shows an increase of 7.8% more than last year's actual expenditure.
"BBC" found, from central and local budget reports
submitted by the Ministry of Finance,
that the public safety expenditures budget of 202.937 billion
Yuan for 2013, was an increase of 7.9% from 2012.
However, in the supplemental reports, the "public safety"
column shows 707.7 billion for 2012 and 769 billion for 2013.
Professor Xie Tian, at University of South Carolina
Aiken Business School said that
the budget report proposed expenditure of 202.9 billion
on public safety, but it is actually 128.9 billion Yuan.
This shows that there is a lot of room for randomness.
Xie Tian said, such a huge gap in the budget will not
happen in a normal country.
Professor Xie Tian: "Regarding public safety,
the CCP is talking about their own safety.
There is a lot of flexibility within the budget.
That means they can increase it, decrease it,
or even make things up."
Xie Tian pointed out that for years, China's stability
maintenance spending has surpassed the military spending.
For the CCP, its biggest threat is not foreign aggression,
but the Chinese people.
Xie Tian: "That means the CCP chooses to confront
people, and is using iron-handed, coercive and violent means to suppress the Chinese people."
Political commentator Lin Zixu said, the public safety budget
is far more than the stability maintenance expenditure.
It shows such a large difference that the CCP
is afraid to openly address it.
Lin Zixu: "Under CCP rule, there are crises everywhere.
Stability maintenance spending can be a bottomless pit.
The CCP has no way to give an accurate estimate.
At the same time, corrupt officials find
this loophole and get rich.
A job costing 100,000 yuan can easily turn into one million.
When the whole world is at peace, they create chaos.
Therefore, the CCP's maintenance expenditures
are getting bigger and bigger every year."
"Deutsche Welle" pointed out that the main reason
for China's safety spending is the Ministry of Public Security
and the Politics and Law Committee like to exaggerate and
concoct a growing number of "imaginary enemies",
under the guise of safeguarding national security
to obtain more funding.
Xie Tian: "The CCP's stability maintenance
is not for public safety.
It is actually to safeguard the interests Group of the CCP.
Judging by the persecution of Falun Gong from the past
ten years, we know that funding for the Political and
Law Committee has had no upper limit—
it gets whatever it needs."
Xie Tian points out that the CCP's stability maintenance
shows inconsistent budget figures, which have turned into a huge economic tumor.
That is also a great burden for the Chinese people.
Xie Tian believes that the CCP has committed
a crime against the Chinese people.
