【新唐人2014年06月17日訊】日前，中共中央紀委駐「中國社會科學院」紀檢組組長、院黨組成員張英偉，批評社科院存在4大問題，其中第4點「社科院存在受境外勢力點對點滲透」，中共黨媒也以此為題發出文章。外界質疑，是否中共會發動一場如58年前一樣的「反右運動」。
6月14號，中共機關報《人民日報》旗下的《人民網》報導，中共中央紀委駐「社科院」紀檢組組長張英偉，10號提出，「社科院」意識形態的主要問題，體現在四個方面：第一、穿上學術的隱身衣，製造煙幕﹔第二、利用互聯網炮製跨國界的歪理﹔第三、每逢敏感時期，進行不法的勾連活動﹔第四，接受境外勢力點對點的滲透。
名為「牛虻」的博客主質疑中共當局《要對「社科院」動手啦？》。他諷刺中共，所謂「製造煙幕」，「跨國歪理」，和「不法勾連」，都不是「中國社科院」科學家智力所能達到的，只有在「接受境外勢力點對點的滲透」後，他們才能具有如此高智商和情商！所以，「境外勢力滲透」才是中國社科院目前面對的最大問題！
大陸網路作家荊楚：「點對點的滲透，甚麼境外反華勢力，經常《人民網》有這樣的稱呼，其實境外的反共人士是有，反華勢力可以說少之又少，它把反共故意替換成反華，本身就是對全國人民的洗腦，海外很多人士他反共，他並不反華。」
「牛虻」問﹕甚麼是「跨國界的歪理」？是社科院一些專家們平時口中最喜歡說的「普世價值」嗎？那位中紀委官員沒有細說。「也許不要多久就會發動起來的革命群眾大批判、大揭發運動，會幫這幫學術權威，把這個問題說清楚的。」
「牛虻」質疑，《人民網》的這篇文章，是否會像58年前《人民日報》的文章一樣，引發一場「反右運動」。
1956年6月8號，中共中央發出《關於組織力量準備反擊右派份子進攻的指示》，同一天，《人民日報》發表《這是為甚麼？》社論，打響了當年「反右鬥爭」的第一槍。隨後數年裡，全國有55萬所謂「右派份子」，倒在了「反右鬥爭」的槍口之下，其中有40多萬，沒有活到20多年後為他們所謂「改正」的那一天。
荊楚：「共產黨的理論、實踐、意識形態完全破產了，心虛理虧，它不敢面對世界和國內人民追求真理，追求真相的探索，在毛澤東時代把全國人民關在鐵屋子裡面，窒息得要死，還讓全國人民產生生在紅旗下，泡在糖水裡的感覺。」
中國社會科學院是被中共稱為：「肩負著從整體上提高中國人文社會科學水平使命」的國家級最高科學院，有31個研究所、45個研究中心、有科研業務人員3200多人，屬於中共的最大智囊機構，一大批學者在政治、經濟、文化等方面為中共中央決策提供理論依據。
原北京首都師範大學副教授李元華認為，中共體制內也存在著不同的派別，而那些強調「社科院」要對中共忠誠的，是中共的極左份子，他們希望倒退到「毛澤東時代」，但是近年來互聯網的發展，使他們非常失望，因而把不同的聲音視為洪水猛獸。
李元華：「一種不排除中共內鬥不同的派別，通過所謂的研究機構，發佈一些消息打擊自己的政敵，再有一種，有一些還沒有喪失良知的學者，把自己的研究成果或調查結果，用報告的形式公布出來，損害那些貪官污吏們的利益。」
去年「社科院」發表過《中國房價面臨全面失控》、《霧霾影響生殖能力》和《農民遷移城鎮被排斥帶來不穩》的學術報告，也發表過《蒼蠅危害大於老虎》等文章
而中紀委要求社科院，要保持所謂政治敏感性，還要切實的加強意識形態建設，在政治上要與黨中央保持高度一致，不容忍任何人搞特例等。
目前《人民網》的這篇文章已經被刪除，不過其它媒體和網站已經紛紛轉載。
採訪編輯/劉惠 後製/孫寧
Central Discipline Inspection Commission (CDIC) of CCP,
accused the social science Academy infiltrated by “overseas forces”
Recently, Mr Zhang Yingwei, head of Central Discipline
Inspection Commission of Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
of Chinese Social Science Academy (CSSA) as well
as member of CCP committee of CSSA,
criticised the CSSA with four key issues,
the fourth issue being, "CSSA has been filtrated
by overseas forces in a point-to-point way".
Media owned by CCP, also published articles
connected to this issue.
The public opinions are questioning: whether CCP launches
yet another "anti-rightist movement",
similar to those during the Cultural Revolution.
On June 14, the People Website, affiliated with CCP,
reported that Zhang Yingwei, head of Central Discipline
and Inspection of CCP at "CASS",
made the suggestion (on June 10) that "CASS" ideology
has four problems:
Firstly, putting on a cloak of academia, creating
a smokescreen;
secondly, using cross-border Internet concocted
sophistry (clever but false arguments);
thirdly, during sensitive periods, conducted illegal
collusion activities;
and lastly, accepted foreign forces penetration
point, where customer orders are accepted by a manufacturer .
Blog writer "Niu Mang," questioned whether
CCP authorities intended taking any action against CASS.
He mocked CCP's so called "smokescreen", "cross-border sophistry"
and "illegal collusion activities,"
to not all be the workings and wisdom of scientists of CASS.
Only after they "have been filtrated by point-to-point
foreign forces",
could they ever achieve such a high level of intelligent
and emotional quotient!
So "being filtrated by foreign forces" is the key issue behind
the workings of CASS .
Mainland Internet writer Jing Chu: "Point-to point filtration,
so called anti-China forces from over-seas, are all too
often seen on the People website.
In fact, there are indeed anti-CCP overseas activists, yet the
numbers are dwindling.
They intentionally replace the anti-CCP slogan, with anti-China,
this is to brainwash all Chinese people.
Many overseas people oppose CCP but they don't oppose China."
"Niu Mang" questioned: what is "cross-border sophistry"?
Is it a term they use meaning "Universal values" claimed
by many experts of CASS?
But the official of CDIC (Central Discipline Inspection
Commission) of CCP, did not mention it.
"It might soon launch revolutionary people to execute
large-scale Thamzing (struggle sessions & propaganda),
along with large-scale exposure movements, aiming at such
academic authorities and clarifying the situation."
On June 8 1956, Central Committee of CCP,
issued "orders to mobilise forces, in preparation of attacking rightists".
On the same day, People's Daily published "What's this for?"
showing the first signs of the "Anti-rightist movement".
In the following couple of years, 0.55 million Chinese rightists,
lied of the attack of "Anti-rightists struggle".
Among them, around 0.4 million people could not possibly
attend the "repealing" day 20 years later.
Jing Chu: "CCP's theories, practice and ideology are
all going to the dogs.
They are guilty and in the wrong. They don't dare
face the reality of the world in its pursuit of the truth.
During Mao's times, he confined all people in an iron cell
creating serious suffocation.
They are trying to maintain a national people's sense of soaking
inside the sweet water under the red banner."
CCP regards CASS as "taking the mission of improving
the overall level of Chinese humanities and social sciences",
this is the highest national Academy of Sciences.
CASS has 31 research institutes, 45 research centres
with a total of more than 3,200 scientific research
and business personnel belonging CCP.
It is also the largest think tank with a large number of scholars
in the political, economic, cultural aspects of
CCP's central committee,
providing a theoretical basis for decision-making.
Former Associate Professor of Beijing "Capital Normal
University" Li Yuanhua,
believes that there are different factions within the CCP regime,
with those who emphasise "CASS" loyalty to CCP,
are the radical leftists of the CCP.
They want to go backwards to a "Mao era". However,
the development of the Internet in recent years,
is of much disappointment to them, as now there are
many voices.
Li Yuanhua: "One possibility which cannot be ruled out,
is to publish messages attacking their political enemies;
another is a scholar without losing his conscience,
or put the research findings or survey results to be published,
in the form of reports on corrupt officials
who harm their interests. "
Last year, "CASS" published " a series of reports including,
"China is facing a comprehensive house price crash",
"haze affects reproductive capacity"
and "excluding farmers during resettling and relocating
from the city and urban areas will bring instability".
CASS also published an article called
"the perils of the flies creates more harm than the Tiger" .
The CDIC of CCP, required "CASS" to maintain
the so-called political sensitivity,
but also effectively strengthen ideological construction,
to be politically highly consistent with the CCP
without tolerating any exceptions and the like.
Currently the People Website has deleted this article,
but other media and websites have been reproduced.
Interview & Edit/Liu Hui Post-Production/Sun Ning
6月14號，中共機關報《人民日報》旗下的《人民網》報導，中共中央紀委駐「社科院」紀檢組組長張英偉，10號提出，「社科院」意識形態的主要問題，體現在四個方面：第一、穿上學術的隱身衣，製造煙幕﹔第二、利用互聯網炮製跨國界的歪理﹔第三、每逢敏感時期，進行不法的勾連活動﹔第四，接受境外勢力點對點的滲透。
名為「牛虻」的博客主質疑中共當局《要對「社科院」動手啦？》。他諷刺中共，所謂「製造煙幕」，「跨國歪理」，和「不法勾連」，都不是「中國社科院」科學家智力所能達到的，只有在「接受境外勢力點對點的滲透」後，他們才能具有如此高智商和情商！所以，「境外勢力滲透」才是中國社科院目前面對的最大問題！
大陸網路作家荊楚：「點對點的滲透，甚麼境外反華勢力，經常《人民網》有這樣的稱呼，其實境外的反共人士是有，反華勢力可以說少之又少，它把反共故意替換成反華，本身就是對全國人民的洗腦，海外很多人士他反共，他並不反華。」
「牛虻」問﹕甚麼是「跨國界的歪理」？是社科院一些專家們平時口中最喜歡說的「普世價值」嗎？那位中紀委官員沒有細說。「也許不要多久就會發動起來的革命群眾大批判、大揭發運動，會幫這幫學術權威，把這個問題說清楚的。」
「牛虻」質疑，《人民網》的這篇文章，是否會像58年前《人民日報》的文章一樣，引發一場「反右運動」。
1956年6月8號，中共中央發出《關於組織力量準備反擊右派份子進攻的指示》，同一天，《人民日報》發表《這是為甚麼？》社論，打響了當年「反右鬥爭」的第一槍。隨後數年裡，全國有55萬所謂「右派份子」，倒在了「反右鬥爭」的槍口之下，其中有40多萬，沒有活到20多年後為他們所謂「改正」的那一天。
荊楚：「共產黨的理論、實踐、意識形態完全破產了，心虛理虧，它不敢面對世界和國內人民追求真理，追求真相的探索，在毛澤東時代把全國人民關在鐵屋子裡面，窒息得要死，還讓全國人民產生生在紅旗下，泡在糖水裡的感覺。」
中國社會科學院是被中共稱為：「肩負著從整體上提高中國人文社會科學水平使命」的國家級最高科學院，有31個研究所、45個研究中心、有科研業務人員3200多人，屬於中共的最大智囊機構，一大批學者在政治、經濟、文化等方面為中共中央決策提供理論依據。
原北京首都師範大學副教授李元華認為，中共體制內也存在著不同的派別，而那些強調「社科院」要對中共忠誠的，是中共的極左份子，他們希望倒退到「毛澤東時代」，但是近年來互聯網的發展，使他們非常失望，因而把不同的聲音視為洪水猛獸。
李元華：「一種不排除中共內鬥不同的派別，通過所謂的研究機構，發佈一些消息打擊自己的政敵，再有一種，有一些還沒有喪失良知的學者，把自己的研究成果或調查結果，用報告的形式公布出來，損害那些貪官污吏們的利益。」
去年「社科院」發表過《中國房價面臨全面失控》、《霧霾影響生殖能力》和《農民遷移城鎮被排斥帶來不穩》的學術報告，也發表過《蒼蠅危害大於老虎》等文章
而中紀委要求社科院，要保持所謂政治敏感性，還要切實的加強意識形態建設，在政治上要與黨中央保持高度一致，不容忍任何人搞特例等。
目前《人民網》的這篇文章已經被刪除，不過其它媒體和網站已經紛紛轉載。
採訪編輯/劉惠 後製/孫寧
Central Discipline Inspection Commission (CDIC) of CCP,
accused the social science Academy infiltrated by “overseas forces”
Recently, Mr Zhang Yingwei, head of Central Discipline
Inspection Commission of Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
of Chinese Social Science Academy (CSSA) as well
as member of CCP committee of CSSA,
criticised the CSSA with four key issues,
the fourth issue being, "CSSA has been filtrated
by overseas forces in a point-to-point way".
Media owned by CCP, also published articles
connected to this issue.
The public opinions are questioning: whether CCP launches
yet another "anti-rightist movement",
similar to those during the Cultural Revolution.
On June 14, the People Website, affiliated with CCP,
reported that Zhang Yingwei, head of Central Discipline
and Inspection of CCP at "CASS",
made the suggestion (on June 10) that "CASS" ideology
has four problems:
Firstly, putting on a cloak of academia, creating
a smokescreen;
secondly, using cross-border Internet concocted
sophistry (clever but false arguments);
thirdly, during sensitive periods, conducted illegal
collusion activities;
and lastly, accepted foreign forces penetration
point, where customer orders are accepted by a manufacturer .
Blog writer "Niu Mang," questioned whether
CCP authorities intended taking any action against CASS.
He mocked CCP's so called "smokescreen", "cross-border sophistry"
and "illegal collusion activities,"
to not all be the workings and wisdom of scientists of CASS.
Only after they "have been filtrated by point-to-point
foreign forces",
could they ever achieve such a high level of intelligent
and emotional quotient!
So "being filtrated by foreign forces" is the key issue behind
the workings of CASS .
Mainland Internet writer Jing Chu: "Point-to point filtration,
so called anti-China forces from over-seas, are all too
often seen on the People website.
In fact, there are indeed anti-CCP overseas activists, yet the
numbers are dwindling.
They intentionally replace the anti-CCP slogan, with anti-China,
this is to brainwash all Chinese people.
Many overseas people oppose CCP but they don't oppose China."
"Niu Mang" questioned: what is "cross-border sophistry"?
Is it a term they use meaning "Universal values" claimed
by many experts of CASS?
But the official of CDIC (Central Discipline Inspection
Commission) of CCP, did not mention it.
"It might soon launch revolutionary people to execute
large-scale Thamzing (struggle sessions & propaganda),
along with large-scale exposure movements, aiming at such
academic authorities and clarifying the situation."
On June 8 1956, Central Committee of CCP,
issued "orders to mobilise forces, in preparation of attacking rightists".
On the same day, People's Daily published "What's this for?"
showing the first signs of the "Anti-rightist movement".
In the following couple of years, 0.55 million Chinese rightists,
lied of the attack of "Anti-rightists struggle".
Among them, around 0.4 million people could not possibly
attend the "repealing" day 20 years later.
Jing Chu: "CCP's theories, practice and ideology are
all going to the dogs.
They are guilty and in the wrong. They don't dare
face the reality of the world in its pursuit of the truth.
During Mao's times, he confined all people in an iron cell
creating serious suffocation.
They are trying to maintain a national people's sense of soaking
inside the sweet water under the red banner."
CCP regards CASS as "taking the mission of improving
the overall level of Chinese humanities and social sciences",
this is the highest national Academy of Sciences.
CASS has 31 research institutes, 45 research centres
with a total of more than 3,200 scientific research
and business personnel belonging CCP.
It is also the largest think tank with a large number of scholars
in the political, economic, cultural aspects of
CCP's central committee,
providing a theoretical basis for decision-making.
Former Associate Professor of Beijing "Capital Normal
University" Li Yuanhua,
believes that there are different factions within the CCP regime,
with those who emphasise "CASS" loyalty to CCP,
are the radical leftists of the CCP.
They want to go backwards to a "Mao era". However,
the development of the Internet in recent years,
is of much disappointment to them, as now there are
many voices.
Li Yuanhua: "One possibility which cannot be ruled out,
is to publish messages attacking their political enemies;
another is a scholar without losing his conscience,
or put the research findings or survey results to be published,
in the form of reports on corrupt officials
who harm their interests. "
Last year, "CASS" published " a series of reports including,
"China is facing a comprehensive house price crash",
"haze affects reproductive capacity"
and "excluding farmers during resettling and relocating
from the city and urban areas will bring instability".
CASS also published an article called
"the perils of the flies creates more harm than the Tiger" .
The CDIC of CCP, required "CASS" to maintain
the so-called political sensitivity,
but also effectively strengthen ideological construction,
to be politically highly consistent with the CCP
without tolerating any exceptions and the like.
Currently the People Website has deleted this article,
but other media and websites have been reproduced.
Interview & Edit/Liu Hui Post-Production/Sun Ning
