【新唐人2012年7月10日讯】《中国青年报》最近刊登评论文章，直接指出：本应在报导和舆论中，起到中流砥柱作用的党报党刊，大报大刊，总是在关键时刻哑火。文章说，传统媒体假装看不见，并不会真的让公众看不见，仅仅是将传播权和主导权白白出让了。分析指出，这说明很多新闻人对中共当局长期严控舆论相当不满，终于在报纸上有所表露。
《中国青年报》4号刊登了一篇“有些事，无法假装看不见”的评论员文章，内容说，近期经常发生一种怪现象，有些事情，网路上议论纷纷，微博有图、有细节，有当事人诉说、有旁观者描述，可传统媒体竟不见半句报导，纸媒无字，电视无影，广播无声。
文章还说，传统媒体假装看不见，并不会让公众看不见，仅仅只是将传播权和主导权白白出让了，结果只会将问题越捂越大，甚至导致问题失控。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣指出，这篇评论文章等于把平时大家都想说的话，挑明了，说出了一些有良知的新闻人内心的不满。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣：“说明很多很多的官方媒体的新闻人相当不满了，终于在报纸上有所表露，也说明了最近为甚么有一些人，再次呼吁要制定新闻法呢，也是反映了很多很多人的心声。”
上世纪80年代，中共当局就批准成立了新闻法起草小组，但新闻立法至今悬而未决。
朱欣欣指出，中共元老陈云曾经坦承，以前中共曾利用国民党的新闻法攻击国民党，如果一旦有了新闻法，就不方便控制媒体了。
朱欣欣：“如果有一个稍微的所谓的违背了它们的权力的规定，有些媒体不是受到整肃，要不就是一些人员受到处理，所以它不敢制定新闻法，它就不能把这个写进去，它如果写进去了呢，它就在全世界人面前，在整个中国人面前，暴露出它独裁专制这么一个体制的本质。”
《中国青年报》的文章还表示，常有人抱怨传统媒体被新兴网路媒体抢了风头，昔日党报媒体、大报大刊日益被边缘化为非主流。传统媒体不见新闻，这表面上看是传统媒体失去话语权，其实，真正失去话语权的是政府部门。
网路作家荆楚指出，中共的传统媒体实质上是中共的发声筒，它的功能就是欺骗民众。
荆楚：“喉舌媒体有个基本的定律，就是西方国家、文明国家发生的芝麻那么大的坏事，它要变成西瓜那么大，人家发生西瓜那么大的好事，它要变成芝麻那么大，或者根本不理，对于国内它是反其道而行之。这样子久而久之它就有了一个舆论导向，就对国人进行了欺骗和蒙弊。”
荆楚表示，久而久之，民众再也不相信传统媒体，这也是因此中共当局公信力和官方喉舌媒体信誉扫地的一种体现。
荆楚：“现在可以说官方的媒体都被网民唾弃了，根本就不相信它了，你像全国发生甚么事情，它要新华社统一发稿，就是全国都统一一个口径，不让你不同的声音存在，只允许一种党八股，假、大、空的声音存在。”
美国国务院公布的2011年人权报告指称，中国是独裁国家，中国的人权情况持续恶化，特别是言论、集会与结社自由方面。
朱欣欣：“一切社会问题，它需要用舆论，用新闻的媒体把它先暴露出来，你才能解决问题，如果捂着盖着，像驼鸟一样假装看不见这些问题，这个社会越来越危险，所以说，在未来中国的改革，必须先从开放言论，开放党禁、报禁从这方面入手。”
朱欣欣指出，网路媒体的蓬勃发展，中共想控制舆论的时代已成过去式，与其被动的控制网路，倒不如顺应民心，放开舆论，让中国的新闻媒体和舆论环境迈入民主国家的行列。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/李月
Chinese Media Admit Traditional Media
Are Marginalized by Internet
China Youth Daily recently published an article stating
that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) key media always keeps silent at critical times.
The article points out that traditional media pretending
not to know the facts does not really blind people.
It only gives an opportunity for other media to report.
Commentators point out that many media professionals
are not satisfied with the CCP’s long-term control.
It finally reveals their attitudes on the newspaper.
China Youth Daily published a commentator’s article entitled
Some Matters Cannot Be Ignored by Pretending Not To See.
It states that a strange phenomenon has occurred recently.
When some incidents are reported on the internet, such as
microblogging, with eyewitness pictures and narration,
there is nothing reported by the traditional media,
such as newspaper, television or radio.
The article also states that traditional media pretending
not to see what is happening will not blind people.
It only gives other the opportunity to report.
The more they want to cover things up, the more serious
the issues will become, and can even go beyond control.
Former Hebei Broadcasting Station editor Zhu Xinxin points
out that this article talks about what people want to say.
It highlights the desertification of those
media professionals with conscience.
Zhu Xinxin: “It shows many official media professionals
are very unhappy, and finally express it in the newspaper.
It shows why recently some people once again are calling
for media laws, which reflects what people want.”
In the 1980’s, the CCP authorities approved a team to draft
media laws, but these law have never been finalized.
Zhu Xinxin points out that former CCP senior official,
Chen Yun, once admitted that in the past,
the CCP used the Kuomintang's new media laws
to attack the Kuomintang.
It will not be convenient to control
media once there is a law.
Zhu Xinxin: “If someone violates the CCP’s rules,
they will be disciplined and punished.
The CCP doesn’t dare to have media laws.
It doesn’t want to document anything, as this will expose
the authorities’ totalitarian nature in front of the whole world.”
An article from People’s Daily also stated that people who
complain about traditional media are marginalized on the internet.
It seems that traditional media has lost its control,
but in fact, it is the government that has lost its control.
Internet writer Jing Chu points out that CCP traditional
media is its mouthpiece that it uses to mislead people.
Jing Chu: “Mouthpiece media has a rule to expand tiny
negative incidents that happen in the West into major events.
It shrinks major positive events in the West into tiny events.
It also does the opposite for things in China.
It misleads people in China.”
Jin Chu comments that people do not believe in traditional
media, and the authorities and its media have lost credibility.
Jing Chu: “Official media have been abandoned
by people, and no one believes in them.
Whenever something happens, Xinhua News Agency will
have the standard report to share with all other official media.
Only party’s voice is allowed.”
The U.S. Department of States Report on Human Rights
Practices for 2011 indicates that China is a dictatorship.
The human rights situation in China continues to deteriorate,
especially in the aspect of freedoms of speech and to gather.
Zhu Xinxin: “All social problems need to be exposed
by media, so that they can be resolved.
If they are covered up, they will become more dangerous.
Future reform in China must start by stopping media control.”
Zhu Xinxin said internet media has developed very fast,
and that the CCP cannot control it anymore.
The CCP should follow people’s wishes to open up media,
and allow the media environment in China to be like that in democratic countries.
《中国青年报》4号刊登了一篇“有些事，无法假装看不见”的评论员文章，内容说，近期经常发生一种怪现象，有些事情，网路上议论纷纷，微博有图、有细节，有当事人诉说、有旁观者描述，可传统媒体竟不见半句报导，纸媒无字，电视无影，广播无声。
文章还说，传统媒体假装看不见，并不会让公众看不见，仅仅只是将传播权和主导权白白出让了，结果只会将问题越捂越大，甚至导致问题失控。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣指出，这篇评论文章等于把平时大家都想说的话，挑明了，说出了一些有良知的新闻人内心的不满。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣：“说明很多很多的官方媒体的新闻人相当不满了，终于在报纸上有所表露，也说明了最近为甚么有一些人，再次呼吁要制定新闻法呢，也是反映了很多很多人的心声。”
上世纪80年代，中共当局就批准成立了新闻法起草小组，但新闻立法至今悬而未决。
朱欣欣指出，中共元老陈云曾经坦承，以前中共曾利用国民党的新闻法攻击国民党，如果一旦有了新闻法，就不方便控制媒体了。
朱欣欣：“如果有一个稍微的所谓的违背了它们的权力的规定，有些媒体不是受到整肃，要不就是一些人员受到处理，所以它不敢制定新闻法，它就不能把这个写进去，它如果写进去了呢，它就在全世界人面前，在整个中国人面前，暴露出它独裁专制这么一个体制的本质。”
《中国青年报》的文章还表示，常有人抱怨传统媒体被新兴网路媒体抢了风头，昔日党报媒体、大报大刊日益被边缘化为非主流。传统媒体不见新闻，这表面上看是传统媒体失去话语权，其实，真正失去话语权的是政府部门。
网路作家荆楚指出，中共的传统媒体实质上是中共的发声筒，它的功能就是欺骗民众。
荆楚：“喉舌媒体有个基本的定律，就是西方国家、文明国家发生的芝麻那么大的坏事，它要变成西瓜那么大，人家发生西瓜那么大的好事，它要变成芝麻那么大，或者根本不理，对于国内它是反其道而行之。这样子久而久之它就有了一个舆论导向，就对国人进行了欺骗和蒙弊。”
荆楚表示，久而久之，民众再也不相信传统媒体，这也是因此中共当局公信力和官方喉舌媒体信誉扫地的一种体现。
荆楚：“现在可以说官方的媒体都被网民唾弃了，根本就不相信它了，你像全国发生甚么事情，它要新华社统一发稿，就是全国都统一一个口径，不让你不同的声音存在，只允许一种党八股，假、大、空的声音存在。”
美国国务院公布的2011年人权报告指称，中国是独裁国家，中国的人权情况持续恶化，特别是言论、集会与结社自由方面。
朱欣欣：“一切社会问题，它需要用舆论，用新闻的媒体把它先暴露出来，你才能解决问题，如果捂着盖着，像驼鸟一样假装看不见这些问题，这个社会越来越危险，所以说，在未来中国的改革，必须先从开放言论，开放党禁、报禁从这方面入手。”
朱欣欣指出，网路媒体的蓬勃发展，中共想控制舆论的时代已成过去式，与其被动的控制网路，倒不如顺应民心，放开舆论，让中国的新闻媒体和舆论环境迈入民主国家的行列。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/李月
Chinese Media Admit Traditional Media
Are Marginalized by Internet
China Youth Daily recently published an article stating
that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) key media always keeps silent at critical times.
The article points out that traditional media pretending
not to know the facts does not really blind people.
It only gives an opportunity for other media to report.
Commentators point out that many media professionals
are not satisfied with the CCP’s long-term control.
It finally reveals their attitudes on the newspaper.
China Youth Daily published a commentator’s article entitled
Some Matters Cannot Be Ignored by Pretending Not To See.
It states that a strange phenomenon has occurred recently.
When some incidents are reported on the internet, such as
microblogging, with eyewitness pictures and narration,
there is nothing reported by the traditional media,
such as newspaper, television or radio.
The article also states that traditional media pretending
not to see what is happening will not blind people.
It only gives other the opportunity to report.
The more they want to cover things up, the more serious
the issues will become, and can even go beyond control.
Former Hebei Broadcasting Station editor Zhu Xinxin points
out that this article talks about what people want to say.
It highlights the desertification of those
media professionals with conscience.
Zhu Xinxin: “It shows many official media professionals
are very unhappy, and finally express it in the newspaper.
It shows why recently some people once again are calling
for media laws, which reflects what people want.”
In the 1980’s, the CCP authorities approved a team to draft
media laws, but these law have never been finalized.
Zhu Xinxin points out that former CCP senior official,
Chen Yun, once admitted that in the past,
the CCP used the Kuomintang's new media laws
to attack the Kuomintang.
It will not be convenient to control
media once there is a law.
Zhu Xinxin: “If someone violates the CCP’s rules,
they will be disciplined and punished.
The CCP doesn’t dare to have media laws.
It doesn’t want to document anything, as this will expose
the authorities’ totalitarian nature in front of the whole world.”
An article from People’s Daily also stated that people who
complain about traditional media are marginalized on the internet.
It seems that traditional media has lost its control,
but in fact, it is the government that has lost its control.
Internet writer Jing Chu points out that CCP traditional
media is its mouthpiece that it uses to mislead people.
Jing Chu: “Mouthpiece media has a rule to expand tiny
negative incidents that happen in the West into major events.
It shrinks major positive events in the West into tiny events.
It also does the opposite for things in China.
It misleads people in China.”
Jin Chu comments that people do not believe in traditional
media, and the authorities and its media have lost credibility.
Jing Chu: “Official media have been abandoned
by people, and no one believes in them.
Whenever something happens, Xinhua News Agency will
have the standard report to share with all other official media.
Only party’s voice is allowed.”
The U.S. Department of States Report on Human Rights
Practices for 2011 indicates that China is a dictatorship.
The human rights situation in China continues to deteriorate,
especially in the aspect of freedoms of speech and to gather.
Zhu Xinxin: “All social problems need to be exposed
by media, so that they can be resolved.
If they are covered up, they will become more dangerous.
Future reform in China must start by stopping media control.”
Zhu Xinxin said internet media has developed very fast,
and that the CCP cannot control it anymore.
The CCP should follow people’s wishes to open up media,
and allow the media environment in China to be like that in democratic countries.
