【新唐人2013年01月18日讯】中国大陆近几年来，有关改革的话题，一再成为舆论的热点。未来的中国，是走西方民主宪政，或在维持中共一党专制的前提下，进行改革﹖中共机关刊物《求是》1月16号刊发的专题文章，强调中国需要的改革，不是“另起炉灶”，不是“推倒重来”，而是要完善体制机制等，换句话说，就是走具有中国特色的改革，不走西方普世的价值观。这样的改革，究竟符合谁的利益﹖中国普罗大众希望这样的改革吗﹖
《求是》的这组文章《改革共识四人谈》，是由4篇文章组成，分别由4名作者评论。
首篇文章《我们需要甚么样的改革》中，作者将西方普世价值观的推崇者奚落一番，并且说，“这是在改革定义上的根本性分歧，他们所讲的改革与我们所搞的改革完全不是一回事。”
时事评论家蓝述表示，这一系列的文章跟中共“十八大”对外的公告，基本上使用同样的语言，和同样的一个思维。也就是说，中共要坚持他们所谓的“不改旗易帜”，也不走僵化回头的路。
时事评论家 蓝述：“基本上所谓不走僵化回头的路，就是不走薄熙来的路；不改旗易帜，就是不走西方宪政的路。这个是中共党内各个利益集团他们最终达成的一种妥协。也就是，不改变中共的执政地位，只改变中共的执政方式的这么一种党内的改革，维持中共一党专制。”
而在《扣准社会脉搏是凝聚改革共识的重要前提》的文章中，作者说，“当前，之所以凝聚改革共识难度加大，一个重要原因是，人们对我国社会基本情况的分析判断存在很大差异。前不久有人指出，当前我国经济社会矛盾几乎到了爆炸的临界点，‘整个社会犹如火山’，‘面临破裂溃散的危险’。这种观点引起许多人的关注，在得到一些人追捧的同时，也受到人们的质疑。”
作者认为，民众在认知上，不应让网路舆论左右自己对社会矛盾的认识。
时事评论员 邢天行：“我觉得这个还是一个老生常谈啦，这么多年谈来谈去，就是在中共的体制之内、在中共的一党领导之下谈改革，所谓的其他的那些名词，甚么‘不照搬’哪，‘不推翻重来’啊，就是保持现有的这些他们的利益不被触动吧。”
所谓《改革共识四人谈》的文章中还提出，要抵制所谓西方敌对势力的网络渗透；同时，应该继续坚持邓小平的“不争论”思想，和摸着石头探索的精神，不要裹足于小小的争论，“先把事情干起来”等。
文章说，中国发展到现在，确实面临不少严峻的挑战，前进道路上有很多困难和问题，诸如发展中不平衡、不协调、不可持续问题依然突出，产业结构不合理，城乡区域发展差距和居民收入分配差距依然较大，社会矛盾明显增多，反腐败斗争形势依然严峻等。对这些困难和问题，党和政府是清楚的。
时事评论员邢天行认为，中共既得利益集团是被目前社会发展的形势，逼到不得不谈改革，也就是说，中国当前的社会形势，对于它的政权来讲是不利的，所以他们必须谈改革。
邢天行：“但是要怎么改，这么多年改来改去的大家也看到了。其实说到底，如果说中共真正的政治体制不改革的话，就是说，它不去推翻它这个政治体制，不结束它一党独裁专制体制的话，那么它谈改革，是没有甚么任何希望的。”
正如《求是》所谓：中国的改革已经进入深水区。经济、政治、文化、社会、民生等领域都有大量问题凸显出来，需要想办法解决。那么，中国人还在等待甚么﹖继续让中共当局欺骗﹖或者走出中国人的另一条路来﹖就让中国13亿人自己决定吧!
采访/陈汉 编辑/周平 后制/薛莉
What Kind of Reform Does China Need?
In recent years, the topic of reform is once again
an issue in public discussion in China.
In future, will China choose the western
democratic constitutional system?
Or will it pretend to reform and keep the
one-party dictatorship of the CCP?
On January 16, the CCP publication Qiushi published a
feature article that emphasized that China needs reform,
This is not to “set up a separate kitchen”,
nor to “reinvent the wheel”.
It needs to perfect the system which means
it needs reform with Chinese characteristics,
and not to take the universal values of
the Western world.
But whose interests will benefit from this kind of reform?
Do the Chinese really want this kind of reform?
The report “Consensus of Four Discussed Reforms”
in Qiushi includes four articles written by four writers.
In the first article “Which Kind of Reform Do We Need?”,
the author laughed at the advocators who support
Western universal values.
It said “this is a fundamental difference from
the definition of reform.
The reform they advocate is totally different from
the reform in which we are engaged.”
Lan Shu, a political commentator said this series
of articles used the same words,
same way of thinking as the CCP’s public announcements
during the 18th Congress.
This also means the CCP persists in its so-called
“Don’t Change the Flag”, we won’t take “the rigid way back”.
Lan Shu: "So basically the so-called do not take the rigid
way back means don’t take the road that Bo Xilai chose.
Don’t change the flag means don’t choose Western
constitutionalism.
This should be a compromise result from which
all struggling parties can benefit.”
In the article “Buckle the Pulse of Society is found the
Important Precondition to Agglomerate Reform Consensus”.
The author said “At present, why is it more difficult to
agglomerate the consensus of reform?
The first important reason is that people’s analysis and
judgment on the basic status of our society is very different.
Few days ago, some people pointed out that the
conflict of our economy in society has almost reached
a critical point of explosion and, ‘the whole of society
is like volcano’, ‘facing rupture and the risk of collapse’.
This point of view attracted much attention.
Some agreed, but some questioned it.
The author thought people should not be so impacted
by information from the Internet.
Xing Tianxing, political commentator: ”I think it’s an old topic.
People have discussed this topic for many years.
It’s a reform under the CCP’s system,
under the one-party dictatorship.
Those sayings like ‘Don’t Copy’, and
‘Don’t overthrow the ‘old only to rebuild it’,
These are words being used to protect
their current benefits.”
The report “Four Discussed Reforms Consensus” said that
people should boycott the so-called hostile Western forces’ penetration by the Internet,
The argument should consist of Deng Xiaoping’s
“don’t argue” mindset and “touch the stone to pass through the river” spirit.
Don’t be blocked by small argument,
“one should try things first”.
The article also said that now, the development of China
is indeed facing many serious challenges.
There are many difficulties in front like unbalanced
development , lack of coordination and unsustainability are outstanding issues.
The industrial structure is irrational; there is a big gap in
the development between urban and rural areas,
The income gap between people is still large,
social conflicts have increased significantly.
The situation in the fight against corruption is still grim.
The party and regime know these issues clearly.
Xing Tianxing, the political commentator thought that
in the current development of social status,
the CCP groups who have vested interests
must talk about reform.
This also means, the current social situation isn’t good for
CCP’s regime, and CCP has to talk about reform.
Xing Tianxing: "But how to reform?
In the past so many years, we saw reforms the CCP did.
Actually, if the political system can’t be changed it means
the CCP can’t reform it’s system, and can’t end it’s one - party dictatorship,
Therefore there’s no hope with its mention of
so called reforms.”
As Qiushi reported: China’s reform has entered
a deep water area.
A large number of problems have cropped up
in the fields of economy, politics, culture, society, people's livelihood, etc.
These problems should be solved.
Then what are the Chinese waiting for?
Waiting to be continually cheated by the CCP?
Or will they walk down another road?
Let’s leave it to the 1.3billion Chinese choose!
《求是》的这组文章《改革共识四人谈》，是由4篇文章组成，分别由4名作者评论。
首篇文章《我们需要甚么样的改革》中，作者将西方普世价值观的推崇者奚落一番，并且说，“这是在改革定义上的根本性分歧，他们所讲的改革与我们所搞的改革完全不是一回事。”
时事评论家蓝述表示，这一系列的文章跟中共“十八大”对外的公告，基本上使用同样的语言，和同样的一个思维。也就是说，中共要坚持他们所谓的“不改旗易帜”，也不走僵化回头的路。
时事评论家 蓝述：“基本上所谓不走僵化回头的路，就是不走薄熙来的路；不改旗易帜，就是不走西方宪政的路。这个是中共党内各个利益集团他们最终达成的一种妥协。也就是，不改变中共的执政地位，只改变中共的执政方式的这么一种党内的改革，维持中共一党专制。”
而在《扣准社会脉搏是凝聚改革共识的重要前提》的文章中，作者说，“当前，之所以凝聚改革共识难度加大，一个重要原因是，人们对我国社会基本情况的分析判断存在很大差异。前不久有人指出，当前我国经济社会矛盾几乎到了爆炸的临界点，‘整个社会犹如火山’，‘面临破裂溃散的危险’。这种观点引起许多人的关注，在得到一些人追捧的同时，也受到人们的质疑。”
作者认为，民众在认知上，不应让网路舆论左右自己对社会矛盾的认识。
时事评论员 邢天行：“我觉得这个还是一个老生常谈啦，这么多年谈来谈去，就是在中共的体制之内、在中共的一党领导之下谈改革，所谓的其他的那些名词，甚么‘不照搬’哪，‘不推翻重来’啊，就是保持现有的这些他们的利益不被触动吧。”
所谓《改革共识四人谈》的文章中还提出，要抵制所谓西方敌对势力的网络渗透；同时，应该继续坚持邓小平的“不争论”思想，和摸着石头探索的精神，不要裹足于小小的争论，“先把事情干起来”等。
文章说，中国发展到现在，确实面临不少严峻的挑战，前进道路上有很多困难和问题，诸如发展中不平衡、不协调、不可持续问题依然突出，产业结构不合理，城乡区域发展差距和居民收入分配差距依然较大，社会矛盾明显增多，反腐败斗争形势依然严峻等。对这些困难和问题，党和政府是清楚的。
时事评论员邢天行认为，中共既得利益集团是被目前社会发展的形势，逼到不得不谈改革，也就是说，中国当前的社会形势，对于它的政权来讲是不利的，所以他们必须谈改革。
邢天行：“但是要怎么改，这么多年改来改去的大家也看到了。其实说到底，如果说中共真正的政治体制不改革的话，就是说，它不去推翻它这个政治体制，不结束它一党独裁专制体制的话，那么它谈改革，是没有甚么任何希望的。”
正如《求是》所谓：中国的改革已经进入深水区。经济、政治、文化、社会、民生等领域都有大量问题凸显出来，需要想办法解决。那么，中国人还在等待甚么﹖继续让中共当局欺骗﹖或者走出中国人的另一条路来﹖就让中国13亿人自己决定吧!
采访/陈汉 编辑/周平 后制/薛莉
What Kind of Reform Does China Need?
In recent years, the topic of reform is once again
an issue in public discussion in China.
In future, will China choose the western
democratic constitutional system?
Or will it pretend to reform and keep the
one-party dictatorship of the CCP?
On January 16, the CCP publication Qiushi published a
feature article that emphasized that China needs reform,
This is not to “set up a separate kitchen”,
nor to “reinvent the wheel”.
It needs to perfect the system which means
it needs reform with Chinese characteristics,
and not to take the universal values of
the Western world.
But whose interests will benefit from this kind of reform?
Do the Chinese really want this kind of reform?
The report “Consensus of Four Discussed Reforms”
in Qiushi includes four articles written by four writers.
In the first article “Which Kind of Reform Do We Need?”,
the author laughed at the advocators who support
Western universal values.
It said “this is a fundamental difference from
the definition of reform.
The reform they advocate is totally different from
the reform in which we are engaged.”
Lan Shu, a political commentator said this series
of articles used the same words,
same way of thinking as the CCP’s public announcements
during the 18th Congress.
This also means the CCP persists in its so-called
“Don’t Change the Flag”, we won’t take “the rigid way back”.
Lan Shu: "So basically the so-called do not take the rigid
way back means don’t take the road that Bo Xilai chose.
Don’t change the flag means don’t choose Western
constitutionalism.
This should be a compromise result from which
all struggling parties can benefit.”
In the article “Buckle the Pulse of Society is found the
Important Precondition to Agglomerate Reform Consensus”.
The author said “At present, why is it more difficult to
agglomerate the consensus of reform?
The first important reason is that people’s analysis and
judgment on the basic status of our society is very different.
Few days ago, some people pointed out that the
conflict of our economy in society has almost reached
a critical point of explosion and, ‘the whole of society
is like volcano’, ‘facing rupture and the risk of collapse’.
This point of view attracted much attention.
Some agreed, but some questioned it.
The author thought people should not be so impacted
by information from the Internet.
Xing Tianxing, political commentator: ”I think it’s an old topic.
People have discussed this topic for many years.
It’s a reform under the CCP’s system,
under the one-party dictatorship.
Those sayings like ‘Don’t Copy’, and
‘Don’t overthrow the ‘old only to rebuild it’,
These are words being used to protect
their current benefits.”
The report “Four Discussed Reforms Consensus” said that
people should boycott the so-called hostile Western forces’ penetration by the Internet,
The argument should consist of Deng Xiaoping’s
“don’t argue” mindset and “touch the stone to pass through the river” spirit.
Don’t be blocked by small argument,
“one should try things first”.
The article also said that now, the development of China
is indeed facing many serious challenges.
There are many difficulties in front like unbalanced
development , lack of coordination and unsustainability are outstanding issues.
The industrial structure is irrational; there is a big gap in
the development between urban and rural areas,
The income gap between people is still large,
social conflicts have increased significantly.
The situation in the fight against corruption is still grim.
The party and regime know these issues clearly.
Xing Tianxing, the political commentator thought that
in the current development of social status,
the CCP groups who have vested interests
must talk about reform.
This also means, the current social situation isn’t good for
CCP’s regime, and CCP has to talk about reform.
Xing Tianxing: "But how to reform?
In the past so many years, we saw reforms the CCP did.
Actually, if the political system can’t be changed it means
the CCP can’t reform it’s system, and can’t end it’s one - party dictatorship,
Therefore there’s no hope with its mention of
so called reforms.”
As Qiushi reported: China’s reform has entered
a deep water area.
A large number of problems have cropped up
in the fields of economy, politics, culture, society, people's livelihood, etc.
These problems should be solved.
Then what are the Chinese waiting for?
Waiting to be continually cheated by the CCP?
Or will they walk down another road?
Let’s leave it to the 1.3billion Chinese choose!
