【新唐人2013年04月02日讯】日前，英国媒体引述来自中国媒体的多个消息源透露，中共各级党的宣传部长都在传达中共中央宣传工作会议精神。有关会议定出了中共中央今后的5点宣传基调，其中包括要求媒体紧遵所谓的“喉舌论”、禁止媒体反党、反马、列、毛等，而且对于那些“新三反人员”，如果不换立场就换人。消息迅速引发外界的关注及批评。
据《中华主流文化网》、《红歌会网》报导，中共最近召开的宣传工作会议上，媒体和媒体人员的宣传基调和方向，成了会议的重要精神。
英国广播公司《BBC》的报导，列出了有关会议定出的5点宣传基调。
1、中国的新旧媒体，都应当是党的喉舌和人民的喉舌。不允许媒体发出不同声音，否则就收回经营权；
2、不允许反马、列、毛言论公开的在媒体上出现；
3、坚持反党、反国家、反民族立场的所谓“新三反人员”不能继续待在媒体，如果他们坚持不换立场就换人；
4、要加强党对媒体的管理和引导，不能让它们总是报导负面东西；
5、不能让有“新三反”倾向的人在高校从事新闻人才的培养工作。
对于这一消息的披露，外界讨论热烈。中国人民大学政治系教授张鸣在微博上质问，中央宣传工作的新精神说反毛的人都得从媒体中清除。清除得了吗？而且在今天这个时代，坚持毛的遗产，不仅是不合时宜的问题，而是跟人类为敌的问题。
不过也有观点不相信中共真的能发出如此荒唐的通知。
《炎黄春秋》总编杨继绳：“我们也是网上看到的，我们不知道，真的假的搞不清楚。可能是假的吧，否则不会那么荒唐吧。不可能真的，那是倒退，倒退中国怎么可能呢？”
时事评论员林子旭则指出，这五点宣传基调，给人的第一感觉就是中共对舆论宣传的管控已经力不从心了。
时事评论员林子旭：“即便是在十几年前，中共不提也没有人敢于公开批毛。这句话背后的潜台词就是，弃毛在中国社会已经成为大的趋势，中共已经很难控制相关言论了，但是最起码自己的喉舌不能跟着一起起哄批毛。”
大陆法治三老之一的法学教授郭道晖，是原清华大学党委常委兼宣传部部长，他表示，所谓的反马、列、毛这个提法，本身就不准确。
原清华大学党委常委兼宣传部长郭道晖：“甚么叫反毛？评论毛泽东、毛泽东思想的一些错误也是必要的。马、列、毛也不能搞在一块，马克思和列宁、毛泽东也有区别。特别是毛泽东晚年的错误，所以说反马、列、毛这个概念不精确。要批评检讨这个教训，这就是反吗？一般甚么叫反，这很难说的。我们也看到中宣部的这个指示。”
而对于不允许媒体发出与党和人民利益相违背的声音，以及要管控所谓的新三反人员，林子旭认为，这话讲的很矛盾。
林子旭：“现在中共和国家、民众的利益已经尖锐对立起来了，中共的这些党棍恰恰是对国家、民族危害最大的人，媒体真的要是站在国家民族的角度进行报导，必然要触及中共权贵阶层的利益，说到底，其他的话都是陪衬，不要反党才是这些基调的核心。”
不过，林子旭认为，新近中央宣传工作会的讲话，与其说是中共在发出命令，不如说它是在哀嚎。
林子旭：“现在的中国人、尤其是媒体人对外部世界了解的非常清楚，人心所向绝不是中宣部的这几条规定所能阻挡得了的，中共现在连被称为‘看家狗’的喉舌媒体都管不明白了，更何况是数以亿计的民众之口。”
林子旭指出，现在中共对媒体的管控达到了一种临界状态，相信要不了多久，中共整个的舆论控制大堤就要决口了。
采访/常春 编辑/王子琦 后制/李智远
CCP's New “Three-Anti” Invites Criticism
Recently British media quoted multiple sources
from Chinese media,
that CCP's propaganda officials at all levels are learning the
“spirit” from CCP's Central Committee Propaganda Conference.
The Conference set five principles for future propaganda,
including the so-called “mouthpiece principle” for media.
It prohibits media reports that criticize CCP, Marx, Lenin,
or Mao Zedong.
Those CCP personnel who do not comply with
these new principles will be removed from office.
The news quickly triggered public concern and criticism.
According to reports from Chinese Mainstream
Culture Network & Red Song Network,
CCP's recent meetings on propaganda
set tones and directions for future media reports.
A BBC report listed five propaganda keynotes set at the meeting:
1. All Chinese media, old and new,
should all be CCP mouthpieces.
Media are forbidden from voicing different opinions,
otherwise their license will be revoked.
2. Media are forbidden from publishing voices against Marx,
Lenin, or Mao Zedong.
3. Personnel who refuse to give up their anti-CCP, anti-state
and anti-nation stances will be removed from all media work.
4. CCP must strengthen its administration and guidance of the
media, restraining them from continuous negative reports.
5. People with the three “anti” tendencies should not work on
education in communication or journalism majors in universities.
The disclosure of this news triggered heated public discussions.
Zhang Ming, professor of political science at People's University,
questioned on weibo the possibility of eradicating all criticisms
against Mao Zedong, as prescribed by CCP Central Propaganda.
He said that it is not only inappropriate but even
anti-humanitarian to maintain Maoism in this day & age.
Some comments questioned the truth,
whether CCP really issued such absurd instructions.
Yang Jisheng, editor-in-chief of Yanhuang Chunqiu:
“We learned about this from the Internet.
We cannot confirm its authenticity.
It might be false news since it is truly absurd.
If it is true, it will be a step backwards.
How can China still move backwards at this time?”
Political critic Lin Zixu pointed out that the five principles
for propaganda leave the impression CCP do not have sufficient control over its propaganda.
Political critic Lin Zixu: “Ten years ago, no one would dare
to openly criticize Maoism, although CCP did not prohibit it either!
The subtext behind these propaganda principles is that
it has become a trend to abandon Maoism in China.
It has become very difficult for CCP to control propaganda.
The only thing it can do is to prevent its own mouthpieces
from joining the choir against Maoism.”
Guo Daohui, Law Professor and former Minister of
Propaganda at Tsinghua University,
said the so-called “anti-Maoism” is
itself an inaccurate expression.
Guo Daohui: “What is anti-Maoism? It is necessary
to review Mao Zedong's ideas and to criticize his mistakes, especially in his later years.
It is not correct to mix together Marx, Lenin and Mao Zedong.
Even Marx is different from the latter two people.
Anti-Marx-Lenin-Maoism is itself an in accurate concept.
Should reflection over Mao's mistakes be anti-Maoism?
We are still reviewing the instructions from
CCP Central Dept. for Propaganda.”
As to the prohibition against “anti-CCP and anti-people voices,”
and the regulations of the new “three-anti” personnel,
Lin Zixu pointed out
these expressions are self-contradictory.
Lin Zixu: “Now the interests of CCP contradicts that
of the state and people.
CCP leaders pose the gravest threat to the country and nation.
If the media report is from a point of view of the nation,
they will surely violate CCP's interests.
All in all, CCP is trying to prohibit anti-CCP voices.
That is the core of their new principles.”
Linzi Xu believes the recent speeches of CCP
Central Propaganda, are not so much instructions but more a hopeless wailing.
Lin Zixu: “Now Chinese people, especially media workers,
clearly understand what is going on in the outside world.
Several provisions from the Central Propaganda Department
can not stand in the way of people's common will.
Now CCP finds it difficult controlling its “watchdog”
mouthpieces, not to mention the hundreds of millions of people before them.”
Lin Zixu pointed out, CCP's media control now
reaches a critical state.
He believes the entire control line will soon be broken.
据《中华主流文化网》、《红歌会网》报导，中共最近召开的宣传工作会议上，媒体和媒体人员的宣传基调和方向，成了会议的重要精神。
英国广播公司《BBC》的报导，列出了有关会议定出的5点宣传基调。
1、中国的新旧媒体，都应当是党的喉舌和人民的喉舌。不允许媒体发出不同声音，否则就收回经营权；
2、不允许反马、列、毛言论公开的在媒体上出现；
3、坚持反党、反国家、反民族立场的所谓“新三反人员”不能继续待在媒体，如果他们坚持不换立场就换人；
4、要加强党对媒体的管理和引导，不能让它们总是报导负面东西；
5、不能让有“新三反”倾向的人在高校从事新闻人才的培养工作。
对于这一消息的披露，外界讨论热烈。中国人民大学政治系教授张鸣在微博上质问，中央宣传工作的新精神说反毛的人都得从媒体中清除。清除得了吗？而且在今天这个时代，坚持毛的遗产，不仅是不合时宜的问题，而是跟人类为敌的问题。
不过也有观点不相信中共真的能发出如此荒唐的通知。
《炎黄春秋》总编杨继绳：“我们也是网上看到的，我们不知道，真的假的搞不清楚。可能是假的吧，否则不会那么荒唐吧。不可能真的，那是倒退，倒退中国怎么可能呢？”
时事评论员林子旭则指出，这五点宣传基调，给人的第一感觉就是中共对舆论宣传的管控已经力不从心了。
时事评论员林子旭：“即便是在十几年前，中共不提也没有人敢于公开批毛。这句话背后的潜台词就是，弃毛在中国社会已经成为大的趋势，中共已经很难控制相关言论了，但是最起码自己的喉舌不能跟着一起起哄批毛。”
大陆法治三老之一的法学教授郭道晖，是原清华大学党委常委兼宣传部部长，他表示，所谓的反马、列、毛这个提法，本身就不准确。
原清华大学党委常委兼宣传部长郭道晖：“甚么叫反毛？评论毛泽东、毛泽东思想的一些错误也是必要的。马、列、毛也不能搞在一块，马克思和列宁、毛泽东也有区别。特别是毛泽东晚年的错误，所以说反马、列、毛这个概念不精确。要批评检讨这个教训，这就是反吗？一般甚么叫反，这很难说的。我们也看到中宣部的这个指示。”
而对于不允许媒体发出与党和人民利益相违背的声音，以及要管控所谓的新三反人员，林子旭认为，这话讲的很矛盾。
林子旭：“现在中共和国家、民众的利益已经尖锐对立起来了，中共的这些党棍恰恰是对国家、民族危害最大的人，媒体真的要是站在国家民族的角度进行报导，必然要触及中共权贵阶层的利益，说到底，其他的话都是陪衬，不要反党才是这些基调的核心。”
不过，林子旭认为，新近中央宣传工作会的讲话，与其说是中共在发出命令，不如说它是在哀嚎。
林子旭：“现在的中国人、尤其是媒体人对外部世界了解的非常清楚，人心所向绝不是中宣部的这几条规定所能阻挡得了的，中共现在连被称为‘看家狗’的喉舌媒体都管不明白了，更何况是数以亿计的民众之口。”
林子旭指出，现在中共对媒体的管控达到了一种临界状态，相信要不了多久，中共整个的舆论控制大堤就要决口了。
采访/常春 编辑/王子琦 后制/李智远
CCP's New “Three-Anti” Invites Criticism
Recently British media quoted multiple sources
from Chinese media,
that CCP's propaganda officials at all levels are learning the
“spirit” from CCP's Central Committee Propaganda Conference.
The Conference set five principles for future propaganda,
including the so-called “mouthpiece principle” for media.
It prohibits media reports that criticize CCP, Marx, Lenin,
or Mao Zedong.
Those CCP personnel who do not comply with
these new principles will be removed from office.
The news quickly triggered public concern and criticism.
According to reports from Chinese Mainstream
Culture Network & Red Song Network,
CCP's recent meetings on propaganda
set tones and directions for future media reports.
A BBC report listed five propaganda keynotes set at the meeting:
1. All Chinese media, old and new,
should all be CCP mouthpieces.
Media are forbidden from voicing different opinions,
otherwise their license will be revoked.
2. Media are forbidden from publishing voices against Marx,
Lenin, or Mao Zedong.
3. Personnel who refuse to give up their anti-CCP, anti-state
and anti-nation stances will be removed from all media work.
4. CCP must strengthen its administration and guidance of the
media, restraining them from continuous negative reports.
5. People with the three “anti” tendencies should not work on
education in communication or journalism majors in universities.
The disclosure of this news triggered heated public discussions.
Zhang Ming, professor of political science at People's University,
questioned on weibo the possibility of eradicating all criticisms
against Mao Zedong, as prescribed by CCP Central Propaganda.
He said that it is not only inappropriate but even
anti-humanitarian to maintain Maoism in this day & age.
Some comments questioned the truth,
whether CCP really issued such absurd instructions.
Yang Jisheng, editor-in-chief of Yanhuang Chunqiu:
“We learned about this from the Internet.
We cannot confirm its authenticity.
It might be false news since it is truly absurd.
If it is true, it will be a step backwards.
How can China still move backwards at this time?”
Political critic Lin Zixu pointed out that the five principles
for propaganda leave the impression CCP do not have sufficient control over its propaganda.
Political critic Lin Zixu: “Ten years ago, no one would dare
to openly criticize Maoism, although CCP did not prohibit it either!
The subtext behind these propaganda principles is that
it has become a trend to abandon Maoism in China.
It has become very difficult for CCP to control propaganda.
The only thing it can do is to prevent its own mouthpieces
from joining the choir against Maoism.”
Guo Daohui, Law Professor and former Minister of
Propaganda at Tsinghua University,
said the so-called “anti-Maoism” is
itself an inaccurate expression.
Guo Daohui: “What is anti-Maoism? It is necessary
to review Mao Zedong's ideas and to criticize his mistakes, especially in his later years.
It is not correct to mix together Marx, Lenin and Mao Zedong.
Even Marx is different from the latter two people.
Anti-Marx-Lenin-Maoism is itself an in accurate concept.
Should reflection over Mao's mistakes be anti-Maoism?
We are still reviewing the instructions from
CCP Central Dept. for Propaganda.”
As to the prohibition against “anti-CCP and anti-people voices,”
and the regulations of the new “three-anti” personnel,
Lin Zixu pointed out
these expressions are self-contradictory.
Lin Zixu: “Now the interests of CCP contradicts that
of the state and people.
CCP leaders pose the gravest threat to the country and nation.
If the media report is from a point of view of the nation,
they will surely violate CCP's interests.
All in all, CCP is trying to prohibit anti-CCP voices.
That is the core of their new principles.”
Linzi Xu believes the recent speeches of CCP
Central Propaganda, are not so much instructions but more a hopeless wailing.
Lin Zixu: “Now Chinese people, especially media workers,
clearly understand what is going on in the outside world.
Several provisions from the Central Propaganda Department
can not stand in the way of people's common will.
Now CCP finds it difficult controlling its “watchdog”
mouthpieces, not to mention the hundreds of millions of people before them.”
Lin Zixu pointed out, CCP's media control now
reaches a critical state.
He believes the entire control line will soon be broken.
