【新唐人2013年05月29日讯】北京“思源社会科学研究中心”总裁曹思源，曾就职于国务院办公厅，和国家经济体制改革委员会，他表示，前中共党魁江泽民的所谓“三个代表”加入《宪法》，是一种“倒退”，应当从《宪法》中挖掉。那么，《宪法》的精神和制度的设立，用意是甚么﹖“三个代表”与《宪法》的内容是否相关﹖接下来请看专家的解析：
2000年2月，江泽民在广东考察工作期间，大谈共产党代表生产力、文化、和人民利益。此后，中共当局不但号召各级党组织学习所谓“三个代表”，并在全国上下迅速掀起了学习和实践“三个代表”的所谓精神的热潮。在江泽民退休时，江的“三个代表”被写进了中共的《宪法》和《党章》。
日前，北京“思源社会科学研究中心”总裁曹思源建议，“三个代表”应从《宪法》中挖掉。
北京思源社会科学研究中心总裁曹思源：“《宪法》呀，是一个国家的制度，是确立如何保障人民的权利，和规范公仆的权力，《宪法》性质上不涉及到所谓‘三个代表’，与《宪法》无关的内容不应该写到《宪法》里去。”
曹思源还表示，“三个代表”应该由人民授权，不能由中共一厢情愿的说“代表”就代表了。
曹思源：“不能够强迫代表﹗严格的讲这个代表，是必须经过选举授权的，现在所说的代表是你不让代表，我也要代表，我代表你说话，你就闭嘴吧﹗你就不要说话，那不行的。我们的言论自由是公民的直接人权，每个人，他都有权利说话，代表，本来是一个很显见的概念。”
这“三个代表”的理论是怎么出来的﹖在《真实的江泽民》一书中介绍，时任中共“中央政策研究室”主席特别助理的王沪宁透露，自己是原作者。而书中表示，江泽民着急为自己立碑，想方设法与毛、邓理论并列，为塑造“第三代理论权威”的形象，让王沪宁“贡献”了“三个代表”理论。
时事评论员司马泰：“本身就不重视《宪法》，不把《宪法》当回事，当成一个自己玩弄的东西，好像自己现在的权力已经坐稳了。他的一套理论，发明一套甚么东西，弄几句话放到《宪法》里去，好像成了共产党一个传统。就是看你能不能把你的几句话写到《宪法》里去。关于是甚么样的话，他们自己并不在乎。”
今年1月28号，在中共中央政治局会议上，中国新领导人习近平明确表示，要重视从青年工人、农民、知识份子中发展党员，优化党员队伍结构。观察人士认为，这是第一次从中央的角度抛弃了精英和财阀，等于否定了江泽民的“三个代表”。
美国中文媒体《北京之春》杂志主编胡平曾表示，中国社会到江泽民下台的时候，权贵私有化已经是积重难返。在中国社会出现的各种矛盾，贫富差距，官民之间的对立越来越严重，一直到胡锦涛时代，都在进一步深化。而只有从这个角度来看江泽民的“三个代表”，才会有一个比较全面的认识。
采访编辑/常春 后制/薛莉
Remove Jiang's “Three Represents” from the Constitution
Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing Si Yuan Social Science
Research Center said that
it is a “setback” to add the so-called “Three Represents”
by the former CCP leader Jiang Zemin to the Constitution.
The “Three Represents“should be removed
from the Constitution.
What is the intention in setting up the Constitution, and
what is the spirit of “Constitution”?
Is there a relation between the “Three Represents” and
constitutional content? Let's take a look at the experts' analysis.
In February 2000, Jiang Zemin talked about the CCP being
representative of productivity, culture, and people's interests during his inspection tour in Guangdong.
After the inspection tour, CCP authorities called upon
party organizations at all levels to learn the so-called “three represents”
and to quickly set off the spirit of learning and practicing
the “ Three Represents “ across the country.
When Jiang Zemin retired, the “Three Represents“ were
added to the Constitution , and to the CCP's constitution.
A few days ago, Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing
Si Yuan Social Science Research Center suggested that
the “Three Represents” should be removed
from the Constitution.
Cao Siyuan: “The Constitution is a country's system.
It is established to protect people's rights and
regulate the power of public servants.
The Constitution does not relate to the so-called
“Three Represents” in nature.
This irrelevant content should not be added to
the Constitution.”
Cao Siyuan also said that, the “Three Represents”
should be authorized by the people,
instead of being merely being an
expression of the CCP's wishes.
Cao Siyuan: “Representations cannot be forced! Strictly speaking,
this representation must be authorized through elections.
The current representation shows that the CCP must
be representative, whether it is allowed or not.
The CCP speaks on your behalf, and then you shut up!
This does not work if you are not allowed to speak.
Freedom of speech is an undeniable right for any
country's citizens.
Everyone has the right to speak.
Representation is a very clear cut concept.”
How does this “Three Represents” theory come across?
According to the description of the “True Jiang Zemin”,
Wang Huning, Special Assistant to the President in the
CCP's “Central Policy Research Office” revealed that
he is the original author of the “Three Represents”.
“The True Jiang Zemin” says that Jiang was “eager for his
tombstone”, he tried to tie in with Mao and Deng's theories
and to shape the “third generation theoretical authority” image.
Then he allowed Wang Huning to provide a “contribution”
to the “Three Represents“ theory.
Commentator Sima Tai: “The CCP does not attach
importance to the 'Constitution'.
The CCP has treated the constitution as a toy,
instead of as a serious matter. Power is firmly secured now.
Then a theory, something invented or
a few words could be added to the Constitution.
This behavior has become a tradition for the CCP.
The CCP becomes concerned and worried if you can put
a few words you wrote into the Constitution.
They themselves do not care what words you say.”
On January 28 this year, the new CCP leader Xi Jinping
expressed clearly in the Politburo meeting that
attention should be paid to developing CCP members
from youth workers, farmers and intellectuals.
He planned to optimize the structure of CCP membership.
Observers believe that this is the first time an attempt has
been made to remove the elite financial magnates from the CCP Central Committee.
The aim is to deny Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”
any recognition.
Hu Ping, the editor in chief of “Beijing Spring” magazine said
that elite privatization was already deeply embedded in
Chinese society when Jiang Zemin stepped down.
Various contradictions emerged in society, the wealth gap
and the confrontations between the government and the people of China,
became more and more serious leading up
to the Hu Jintao era.
Only from this viewpoint will we have a more comprehensive
understanding of Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”.
2000年2月，江泽民在广东考察工作期间，大谈共产党代表生产力、文化、和人民利益。此后，中共当局不但号召各级党组织学习所谓“三个代表”，并在全国上下迅速掀起了学习和实践“三个代表”的所谓精神的热潮。在江泽民退休时，江的“三个代表”被写进了中共的《宪法》和《党章》。
日前，北京“思源社会科学研究中心”总裁曹思源建议，“三个代表”应从《宪法》中挖掉。
北京思源社会科学研究中心总裁曹思源：“《宪法》呀，是一个国家的制度，是确立如何保障人民的权利，和规范公仆的权力，《宪法》性质上不涉及到所谓‘三个代表’，与《宪法》无关的内容不应该写到《宪法》里去。”
曹思源还表示，“三个代表”应该由人民授权，不能由中共一厢情愿的说“代表”就代表了。
曹思源：“不能够强迫代表﹗严格的讲这个代表，是必须经过选举授权的，现在所说的代表是你不让代表，我也要代表，我代表你说话，你就闭嘴吧﹗你就不要说话，那不行的。我们的言论自由是公民的直接人权，每个人，他都有权利说话，代表，本来是一个很显见的概念。”
这“三个代表”的理论是怎么出来的﹖在《真实的江泽民》一书中介绍，时任中共“中央政策研究室”主席特别助理的王沪宁透露，自己是原作者。而书中表示，江泽民着急为自己立碑，想方设法与毛、邓理论并列，为塑造“第三代理论权威”的形象，让王沪宁“贡献”了“三个代表”理论。
时事评论员司马泰：“本身就不重视《宪法》，不把《宪法》当回事，当成一个自己玩弄的东西，好像自己现在的权力已经坐稳了。他的一套理论，发明一套甚么东西，弄几句话放到《宪法》里去，好像成了共产党一个传统。就是看你能不能把你的几句话写到《宪法》里去。关于是甚么样的话，他们自己并不在乎。”
今年1月28号，在中共中央政治局会议上，中国新领导人习近平明确表示，要重视从青年工人、农民、知识份子中发展党员，优化党员队伍结构。观察人士认为，这是第一次从中央的角度抛弃了精英和财阀，等于否定了江泽民的“三个代表”。
美国中文媒体《北京之春》杂志主编胡平曾表示，中国社会到江泽民下台的时候，权贵私有化已经是积重难返。在中国社会出现的各种矛盾，贫富差距，官民之间的对立越来越严重，一直到胡锦涛时代，都在进一步深化。而只有从这个角度来看江泽民的“三个代表”，才会有一个比较全面的认识。
采访编辑/常春 后制/薛莉
Remove Jiang's “Three Represents” from the Constitution
Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing Si Yuan Social Science
Research Center said that
it is a “setback” to add the so-called “Three Represents”
by the former CCP leader Jiang Zemin to the Constitution.
The “Three Represents“should be removed
from the Constitution.
What is the intention in setting up the Constitution, and
what is the spirit of “Constitution”?
Is there a relation between the “Three Represents” and
constitutional content? Let's take a look at the experts' analysis.
In February 2000, Jiang Zemin talked about the CCP being
representative of productivity, culture, and people's interests during his inspection tour in Guangdong.
After the inspection tour, CCP authorities called upon
party organizations at all levels to learn the so-called “three represents”
and to quickly set off the spirit of learning and practicing
the “ Three Represents “ across the country.
When Jiang Zemin retired, the “Three Represents“ were
added to the Constitution , and to the CCP's constitution.
A few days ago, Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing
Si Yuan Social Science Research Center suggested that
the “Three Represents” should be removed
from the Constitution.
Cao Siyuan: “The Constitution is a country's system.
It is established to protect people's rights and
regulate the power of public servants.
The Constitution does not relate to the so-called
“Three Represents” in nature.
This irrelevant content should not be added to
the Constitution.”
Cao Siyuan also said that, the “Three Represents”
should be authorized by the people,
instead of being merely being an
expression of the CCP's wishes.
Cao Siyuan: “Representations cannot be forced! Strictly speaking,
this representation must be authorized through elections.
The current representation shows that the CCP must
be representative, whether it is allowed or not.
The CCP speaks on your behalf, and then you shut up!
This does not work if you are not allowed to speak.
Freedom of speech is an undeniable right for any
country's citizens.
Everyone has the right to speak.
Representation is a very clear cut concept.”
How does this “Three Represents” theory come across?
According to the description of the “True Jiang Zemin”,
Wang Huning, Special Assistant to the President in the
CCP's “Central Policy Research Office” revealed that
he is the original author of the “Three Represents”.
“The True Jiang Zemin” says that Jiang was “eager for his
tombstone”, he tried to tie in with Mao and Deng's theories
and to shape the “third generation theoretical authority” image.
Then he allowed Wang Huning to provide a “contribution”
to the “Three Represents“ theory.
Commentator Sima Tai: “The CCP does not attach
importance to the 'Constitution'.
The CCP has treated the constitution as a toy,
instead of as a serious matter. Power is firmly secured now.
Then a theory, something invented or
a few words could be added to the Constitution.
This behavior has become a tradition for the CCP.
The CCP becomes concerned and worried if you can put
a few words you wrote into the Constitution.
They themselves do not care what words you say.”
On January 28 this year, the new CCP leader Xi Jinping
expressed clearly in the Politburo meeting that
attention should be paid to developing CCP members
from youth workers, farmers and intellectuals.
He planned to optimize the structure of CCP membership.
Observers believe that this is the first time an attempt has
been made to remove the elite financial magnates from the CCP Central Committee.
The aim is to deny Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”
any recognition.
Hu Ping, the editor in chief of “Beijing Spring” magazine said
that elite privatization was already deeply embedded in
Chinese society when Jiang Zemin stepped down.
Various contradictions emerged in society, the wealth gap
and the confrontations between the government and the people of China,
became more and more serious leading up
to the Hu Jintao era.
Only from this viewpoint will we have a more comprehensive
understanding of Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”.
