【新唐人2014年05月30日讯】在“六四25周年”前夕，前中共沈阳军区军人李晓明，在电视镜头前，披露当年奉命镇压“六四学运”的亲身经历，在讲述的过程中，他频频落泪，他说这是他毕生的耻辱。
李晓明是前中共沈阳军区39军1164高炮团中尉，日前，他接受香港《NOW》电视台访问，痛述当年奉命进入天安门广场，开枪清场的经历。
李晓明说，当时39军从北京城东向天安门广场开进，途中被民众阻拦，要求他们不要向学生和老百姓开枪。但是，6月3号晚，他们被告知，有暴徒打死军人，听到消息后，他们每个人都义愤填胸，这时，上级将子弹发给他们，命令他们要不惜一切开进天安门广场清场。
李晓明还透露，3号深夜，团长派人到天安门侦查情况，发现其他军队已经开枪镇压。39军是在4号清晨开入广场，并负责协助警方追捕在逃学生和民运人士。
虽然已事隔25年，但说到当年经历，李晓明仍不禁泪流满面，不断的说“这是一个耻辱”。
原“中国政法大学”讲师吴仁华：“军人在6月3号晚上，就向天安门广场开进，然后开枪杀人，主要原因是受到了当局欺骗的宣传。当局把他们封闭在临时的驻扎地，他们没办法跟民众、学生接触，不了解真实的情况。当局一再的跟他们说，很多戒严部队的军人遭到暴徒的绑架，甚至杀害，很多军人的武器被抢夺，北京发生了暴乱。他们以为北京真的发生了反革命暴乱。”
吴仁华是“六四事件”的目击者，曾出版《六四事件中的戒严部队》一书，详细讲述“六四事件”中，进入北京的戒严部队的情况，包括进京路线，进京后做了甚么？在屠杀之夜他们执行任务的情况。
原中共党媒《新华社》首席记者和广播电视部副部长谢文清，也曾耳闻、目睹、亲历“六四”血腥镇压的恐怖之夜。
谢文清在《死心篇》一文中说，被烧毁的装甲车排列得整整齐齐，一条直线摆开，车与车之间距离相等，车头也一律朝东，类似军事检阅时的列队阵容，以他做过军事记者的经验，一看就看出这是一个精心策划的骗局。
谢文清指出，这些战车显然都是过时报废的装备，由化装成便衣入城的所谓“解放军”军人自行烧毁，然后栽赃说是“暴徒”做的。
据了解，至今共有3名军人出面忏悔“六四”血腥镇压暴行。戒严部队士兵张世军多年来常到北京市郊的万安公墓，祭拜“六四遇难者”，也曾找到受害者家属表示忏悔。2012年“六四”前夕，他还穿上当年的军装到天安门广场默哀。
吴仁华：“这三名军人后来了解了真相，北京根本就没有发生反革命暴乱，他们开枪所杀害的这些人并不是暴徒，都是一些赤手空拳的平民百姓跟学生，他们是在了解真相以后才觉得，当年开枪镇压是一种耻辱。”
“六四死难者”亲属组织“天安门母亲”成员张先玲的丈夫王凡地指出，中共当局至今仍极力阻止人们了解真相。
“天安门母亲”成员张先玲丈夫王凡地：“比哪年都严，我们家里现在24小时有保镳的，他主要是对媒体，他不希望媒体来采访我们，从清明4月份开始就有了，来的人有国保大队的，有派出所的，有街道的，来的层面有保安，各种各样的成员，24小时一共12人在那里换班。”
5月28号，美国众议院通过决议，呼吁中共当局停止审查天安门大屠杀相关资讯，并停止骚扰、拘禁、虐待那些表达言论与信仰自由的中国公民。众议院民主党领袖裴洛西（Nancy Pelosi）还拿出“六四事件”中，中国公民王维林只身阻止坦克前进的照片说：“这是全世界民主自由历史中，最具代表性的图像之一。然而，如果你到中国，问年轻人有关这张照片的事，他们却一无所知。”
采访/朱智善 编辑/陈洁 后制/李勇
A former CCP Military Officer Cries and Regrets Participating
in the Massacre of 64 Event
Before the 25th Anniversary of 64 Event, Li Xiaoming a former army officer of Shenyang Military Region of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), sat in front of the TV camera and talked about his personal experience of the blood shed oppression of 64 Student Movement, which was initiated by the orders of upper-level authorities. During the discussion of the oppressive process, he shed tears frequently, and said this was his lifetime of shame.
Li was lieutenant of 1164 Flak Regiment of 39th Army of Shenyang Military Region of the CCP. In recent days, he was interviewed by Hong Kong NOW TV and told of his personal experience of shooting and acting under orders.
Mr Xiaoming says, at the time when 39th Army marched from eastern Beijing City to Tian'Anmen Square, they were blocked by civilians and required not to shoot students and civilians. However, on the night of June 3, they were informed that some mobs had killed some of the soldiers. After hearing this news, everyone of them felt extreme anger towards the students. It was at this moment that they received bullets from the upper level authorities, and then ordered to march for Tian'Anmen Square and clean out any elements at any cost.
Mr Li Xiaoming also exposed, how at midnight of June 3, the colonel in charge dispatched someone to monitor the situation at Tian'Anmen Square, finding other armies had started to shoot the students. Then 39th Army entered the Square in the early hours of June 4. They were placed in charge of assisting the police with catching fleeing students and activists of the Democracy Movement.
Despite recalling the experience 25 years ago, Mr Li still could not help from crying out of control, repeating "this is a shame".
The former lecturer of China University of Political Science and Law Wu Renhua:
"On the evening of June 3, the army marched for Tian'Anmen Square shooting and killing people and students. The main cause of this tragedy, is these soldiers were cheated by the authorities' propaganda. The authorities had placed the students in temporary camps without discussing the situation with them to find out what had really happened.
The authorities repeated their lies that many soldiers of the curfew army have been kidnapped and killed; that many soldiers' weapons were robbed and a riot was occurring in Beijing. So they took it for granted that an anti-revolution riot was really taking place."
Wu Renhua is a witness of 64 Event and once published a book Curfew Army during the 64 Event. It gives a detailed description on the activities of the curfew army during the 64 Event, including the routes of entering Beijing, what they did after entering Beijing, and what sort of missions they executed on the night of the massacre.
Xie Wenqing is a former Chief Journalist of CCP's official media Xinhua News Agency. Also an Ex-Deputy Minister of Broadcasting and Television Ministry. Xie apparently also experienced the horrific night of 64 event, of the blood shed and suppression.
Xie Wenqing says in the article "Dead Heart", the destroyed armoured vehicles were uniformly placed. All the armoured cars were heading east, which is similar to an array appearance for a military parade. According to his experience as military journalist, it is easy to identify that this is a deliberately plotted deceitful case.
Xie Wenqing says, these armoured cars were apparently out-of-date equipment , and burned by plain-clothed PLA soldiers. Then the result was framed on "mobs".
It is understood up till now, three army officers publicly announced regret for their role in the bloodshed shooting during 64 Event.
Mr Zhang Shijun, one of the soldiers from the curfew armies, had also participated in the 64 event. For many years he regularly visited the Wang'An Public Cemetery in the Beijing suburbs, where the memorial stone lay commemorating the “64 event victims”. Before 64 Event in 2012, he stood in silent tribute for victims at Tian'Anmen Square by dressing in the military uniform of that time.
Wu Renhua: "Three military soldiers later understood the truth behind 64 event, that the anti-revolution riot in Beijing is a total lie. The people who lost their lives on that fateful day, were civilians and students without weapons, they were not thugs. Once coming to understand the truth, they awoke to the realities, realising the shooting was a total sham."
An organisation created in support of the 64 event Victims' families, called "Tian'Anmen Mothers", members Zhang Xianling and Mr Wang Fandi say, the CCP authorities still block people from learning the truth.
Wang Fandi: "This year we suffer stricter controls than any other year. Our homes are constantly watched by guards 24 hours a day. Their aim is to block media from interviewing us. This started from Tomb Sweeping's Day in April. The guards include national security police, local police, local community committee staff and many others. A total of 24 people in shifts are monitoring us 24 hours a day."
On May 28, US Congress passed a decision, and called for CCP Authorities to stop their censorship on relevant information about Tian'Anmen Massacre. And to also stop the harassment, confining and abuse of Chinese citizens who enjoy the rights to freedom of speech and belief.
Nancy Pelosi is the Democratic Party;s leader of Congress. She took out the photo of Chinese citizen Mr Wang Weilin, who stood alone in front of the tank during the 64 event. She said, This is by far the most iconic photo ever witnessed in our times of democracy and freedom. However, if you visit China today and ask any young person what the picture portrays, they have no idea whatsoever what it is about.
Interview/Zhu Zhishan Edit/Chen Jie Post-Production/Li Yong
李晓明是前中共沈阳军区39军1164高炮团中尉，日前，他接受香港《NOW》电视台访问，痛述当年奉命进入天安门广场，开枪清场的经历。
李晓明说，当时39军从北京城东向天安门广场开进，途中被民众阻拦，要求他们不要向学生和老百姓开枪。但是，6月3号晚，他们被告知，有暴徒打死军人，听到消息后，他们每个人都义愤填胸，这时，上级将子弹发给他们，命令他们要不惜一切开进天安门广场清场。
李晓明还透露，3号深夜，团长派人到天安门侦查情况，发现其他军队已经开枪镇压。39军是在4号清晨开入广场，并负责协助警方追捕在逃学生和民运人士。
虽然已事隔25年，但说到当年经历，李晓明仍不禁泪流满面，不断的说“这是一个耻辱”。
原“中国政法大学”讲师吴仁华：“军人在6月3号晚上，就向天安门广场开进，然后开枪杀人，主要原因是受到了当局欺骗的宣传。当局把他们封闭在临时的驻扎地，他们没办法跟民众、学生接触，不了解真实的情况。当局一再的跟他们说，很多戒严部队的军人遭到暴徒的绑架，甚至杀害，很多军人的武器被抢夺，北京发生了暴乱。他们以为北京真的发生了反革命暴乱。”
吴仁华是“六四事件”的目击者，曾出版《六四事件中的戒严部队》一书，详细讲述“六四事件”中，进入北京的戒严部队的情况，包括进京路线，进京后做了甚么？在屠杀之夜他们执行任务的情况。
原中共党媒《新华社》首席记者和广播电视部副部长谢文清，也曾耳闻、目睹、亲历“六四”血腥镇压的恐怖之夜。
谢文清在《死心篇》一文中说，被烧毁的装甲车排列得整整齐齐，一条直线摆开，车与车之间距离相等，车头也一律朝东，类似军事检阅时的列队阵容，以他做过军事记者的经验，一看就看出这是一个精心策划的骗局。
谢文清指出，这些战车显然都是过时报废的装备，由化装成便衣入城的所谓“解放军”军人自行烧毁，然后栽赃说是“暴徒”做的。
据了解，至今共有3名军人出面忏悔“六四”血腥镇压暴行。戒严部队士兵张世军多年来常到北京市郊的万安公墓，祭拜“六四遇难者”，也曾找到受害者家属表示忏悔。2012年“六四”前夕，他还穿上当年的军装到天安门广场默哀。
吴仁华：“这三名军人后来了解了真相，北京根本就没有发生反革命暴乱，他们开枪所杀害的这些人并不是暴徒，都是一些赤手空拳的平民百姓跟学生，他们是在了解真相以后才觉得，当年开枪镇压是一种耻辱。”
“六四死难者”亲属组织“天安门母亲”成员张先玲的丈夫王凡地指出，中共当局至今仍极力阻止人们了解真相。
“天安门母亲”成员张先玲丈夫王凡地：“比哪年都严，我们家里现在24小时有保镳的，他主要是对媒体，他不希望媒体来采访我们，从清明4月份开始就有了，来的人有国保大队的，有派出所的，有街道的，来的层面有保安，各种各样的成员，24小时一共12人在那里换班。”
5月28号，美国众议院通过决议，呼吁中共当局停止审查天安门大屠杀相关资讯，并停止骚扰、拘禁、虐待那些表达言论与信仰自由的中国公民。众议院民主党领袖裴洛西（Nancy Pelosi）还拿出“六四事件”中，中国公民王维林只身阻止坦克前进的照片说：“这是全世界民主自由历史中，最具代表性的图像之一。然而，如果你到中国，问年轻人有关这张照片的事，他们却一无所知。”
采访/朱智善 编辑/陈洁 后制/李勇
A former CCP Military Officer Cries and Regrets Participating
in the Massacre of 64 Event
Before the 25th Anniversary of 64 Event, Li Xiaoming a former army officer of Shenyang Military Region of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), sat in front of the TV camera and talked about his personal experience of the blood shed oppression of 64 Student Movement, which was initiated by the orders of upper-level authorities. During the discussion of the oppressive process, he shed tears frequently, and said this was his lifetime of shame.
Li was lieutenant of 1164 Flak Regiment of 39th Army of Shenyang Military Region of the CCP. In recent days, he was interviewed by Hong Kong NOW TV and told of his personal experience of shooting and acting under orders.
Mr Xiaoming says, at the time when 39th Army marched from eastern Beijing City to Tian'Anmen Square, they were blocked by civilians and required not to shoot students and civilians. However, on the night of June 3, they were informed that some mobs had killed some of the soldiers. After hearing this news, everyone of them felt extreme anger towards the students. It was at this moment that they received bullets from the upper level authorities, and then ordered to march for Tian'Anmen Square and clean out any elements at any cost.
Mr Li Xiaoming also exposed, how at midnight of June 3, the colonel in charge dispatched someone to monitor the situation at Tian'Anmen Square, finding other armies had started to shoot the students. Then 39th Army entered the Square in the early hours of June 4. They were placed in charge of assisting the police with catching fleeing students and activists of the Democracy Movement.
Despite recalling the experience 25 years ago, Mr Li still could not help from crying out of control, repeating "this is a shame".
The former lecturer of China University of Political Science and Law Wu Renhua:
"On the evening of June 3, the army marched for Tian'Anmen Square shooting and killing people and students. The main cause of this tragedy, is these soldiers were cheated by the authorities' propaganda. The authorities had placed the students in temporary camps without discussing the situation with them to find out what had really happened.
The authorities repeated their lies that many soldiers of the curfew army have been kidnapped and killed; that many soldiers' weapons were robbed and a riot was occurring in Beijing. So they took it for granted that an anti-revolution riot was really taking place."
Wu Renhua is a witness of 64 Event and once published a book Curfew Army during the 64 Event. It gives a detailed description on the activities of the curfew army during the 64 Event, including the routes of entering Beijing, what they did after entering Beijing, and what sort of missions they executed on the night of the massacre.
Xie Wenqing is a former Chief Journalist of CCP's official media Xinhua News Agency. Also an Ex-Deputy Minister of Broadcasting and Television Ministry. Xie apparently also experienced the horrific night of 64 event, of the blood shed and suppression.
Xie Wenqing says in the article "Dead Heart", the destroyed armoured vehicles were uniformly placed. All the armoured cars were heading east, which is similar to an array appearance for a military parade. According to his experience as military journalist, it is easy to identify that this is a deliberately plotted deceitful case.
Xie Wenqing says, these armoured cars were apparently out-of-date equipment , and burned by plain-clothed PLA soldiers. Then the result was framed on "mobs".
It is understood up till now, three army officers publicly announced regret for their role in the bloodshed shooting during 64 Event.
Mr Zhang Shijun, one of the soldiers from the curfew armies, had also participated in the 64 event. For many years he regularly visited the Wang'An Public Cemetery in the Beijing suburbs, where the memorial stone lay commemorating the “64 event victims”. Before 64 Event in 2012, he stood in silent tribute for victims at Tian'Anmen Square by dressing in the military uniform of that time.
Wu Renhua: "Three military soldiers later understood the truth behind 64 event, that the anti-revolution riot in Beijing is a total lie. The people who lost their lives on that fateful day, were civilians and students without weapons, they were not thugs. Once coming to understand the truth, they awoke to the realities, realising the shooting was a total sham."
An organisation created in support of the 64 event Victims' families, called "Tian'Anmen Mothers", members Zhang Xianling and Mr Wang Fandi say, the CCP authorities still block people from learning the truth.
Wang Fandi: "This year we suffer stricter controls than any other year. Our homes are constantly watched by guards 24 hours a day. Their aim is to block media from interviewing us. This started from Tomb Sweeping's Day in April. The guards include national security police, local police, local community committee staff and many others. A total of 24 people in shifts are monitoring us 24 hours a day."
On May 28, US Congress passed a decision, and called for CCP Authorities to stop their censorship on relevant information about Tian'Anmen Massacre. And to also stop the harassment, confining and abuse of Chinese citizens who enjoy the rights to freedom of speech and belief.
Nancy Pelosi is the Democratic Party;s leader of Congress. She took out the photo of Chinese citizen Mr Wang Weilin, who stood alone in front of the tank during the 64 event. She said, This is by far the most iconic photo ever witnessed in our times of democracy and freedom. However, if you visit China today and ask any young person what the picture portrays, they have no idea whatsoever what it is about.
Interview/Zhu Zhishan Edit/Chen Jie Post-Production/Li Yong
