【禁聞】加媒:白求恩鬧劇該收場了!

2012年08月04日加拿大
【新唐人2012年8月4日訊】近來,加拿大政府出資修建「白求恩紀念館」一事,引發各界很大質疑。繼加拿大國會議員安德斯指出,政府不該花費納稅人的錢去紀念白求恩這樣一個「邪惡的共產主義毛派信徒」之後,加拿大媒體也刊登專欄文章認為,「白求恩」是一場由中國共產黨引發的鬧劇,現在應該收場了。

7月11號,加拿大政府出資250萬加元興建的「白求恩遊客接待中心」,在安大略省格雷文赫斯特鎮建成開業。而圍繞這一項目的爭議,卻遠遠沒有結束。

7月21號,加拿大《多倫多太陽報》刊登報社創辦人彼得•沃辛頓(Peter Worthington)的文章指出:白求恩是一場由中國共產黨引發的鬧劇,現在應該收場了。

文章援引了已故駐華大使高文(Michel Gauvin)的故事。高文曾經告訴中共外長,「不要以白求恩的名義乾杯」,因為白求恩不是加拿大的愛國者,恰恰相反,他違背了加拿大人的價值觀。

美國「南加州大學」公共政策博士葉科:「加拿大是一個民主、自由、人權這樣一個社會,那麼白求恩當年其實是跑到中國去支持了共產黨。而共產黨有專制和打壓人權的歷史。」

葉科指出,中共所為一直與普世價值背道而馳,特別是近期,中共因為出售死刑犯器官、活摘法輪功學員器官、對外進行「紅色輸出」等問題,更是備受譴責。

中國歷史學者李元華則談到,中共利用白求恩的外國人身份來為自己進行宣傳,對民眾毒害很大。

中國歷史學者李元華:「白求恩本身也不像共產黨宣傳的那樣,他也不是一個有職業操守的好的醫生、外科大夫。那麼他的所作所為,實際上是共產黨粉飾出來的教育百姓的一個典型。」

根據加拿大歷史學家羅德裡克‧斯圖爾特及其夫人莎朗的研究,白求恩沉溺女色、性情暴戾,婚姻也一再破裂。

1936年,白求恩作為共產黨人,參加西班牙內戰,建立了歷史上第一個流動輸血站,但他縱情聲色、酗酒、脾氣暴躁,最後被迫離開西班牙。1938年,白求恩來到中國,但他惡習難改,被人發現,長達幾天醉臥在妓院中。

1939年,白求恩作為中共軍隊的救護醫生,因割傷手指、感染敗血症而死亡。

當白求恩奄奄一息的時候,中共曾搞到抗生素等藥品,官員詢問是否需要用藥。白求恩回答:「還是用吧,為了我們的事業,生命也是重要的。」可這句話最後卻傳成了「還是算了吧,為了我們的事業,生命也是可以奉獻的。」

白求恩死後,毛澤東特意寫了一篇文章,吹捧在加拿大名不見經傳的白求恩:為抗日而獻出寶貴生命。

但實際上,白求恩並非為抗日而死,他是為中共政權而死。 《大紀元》新聞網指出,中共只是在抗戰最初參加了有限的戰鬥,之後便專心準備內戰。白求恩死亡的背後,掩蓋的是中共「假抗日、真發展」的彌天大謊。

李元華:「白求恩沒有在幫助中國人抗戰,實際是在幫助對中國抗戰事業背後做掣腳工作、搗亂工作的中共,實際上等於是對中華民族救亡起到一個負面的作用。」

1976年,加拿大政府在白求恩的出生地設置白求恩故居和紀念館。2009年,加拿大政府投資250萬加元興建「白求恩故居遊客中心」,從而引發一系列爭議。

葉科認為,這是中共長期進行欺騙性宣傳的結果。在中國大陸,白求恩儼然被吹捧成了英雄。

葉科:「那麼在現在這個時代,很多國家為了一些經濟上的利益,或者是為了旅遊,就利用這樣的一個知名度,來進行商業旅遊、經濟利益上的考量。」

《多倫多太陽報》正在進行的一項調查顯示,有超過百分之80的人,反對加拿大政府花費納稅人的錢為白求恩修建紀念館。

採訪/劉惠 編輯/李謙 後製/鍾元


Time for Bethune Farce to Come to an End!

Recently, the Canadian government's funding of Henry
Norman Bethune Memorial left many doubting it seriously.
Canadian Parliament Member Rob Anders points out that

the government should not use taxpayers money
to memorialize an evil Communist Maoist follower.
Canadian media also posted a special column saying that

Bethune is a farce caused by the Chinese Communist Party
and it is now time to end the show.

On July 11th, the Canadian government contributed 2.5 million
Canadian Dollars to build Bethune Tourist Reception Center
in Gravenhurst, Ontario.
Yet the controversy surrounding this project is far from over.

On July 21st, The Toronto Sun posted the Newspaper
founder Peter Worthington's article,
pointing out that Bethune is a farce caused by the Chinese
Communist Party and it is now time to end the show.

The article recounted the author's meeting with Michel Gauvin
– Canada』s ambassador to China at the time (since deceased).
Gauvin had said “I would appreciate it if for the duration of
my time in China as Canada's ambassador,
that there be no more toasts in my presence to Dr. Bethune.

I feel must tell you that I do not consider Dr. Bethune a
Canadian patriot, but hostile to the values of my country.”

Dr. Ye of Public Policy at the University of Southern California:
“Canada is a democratic, free society with human rights.
Bethune went to China to support the Communist Party.

However the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a history of
dictatorship and suppression of human rights.”

Dr. Ye says that CCP has always opposed universal values,

especially recently by selling death-row prisoners' organs
and the live harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners' organs.
They have also promoted Communist Red Songs (such as to
Hong Kong, etc), the CCP is criticized even more so.

Chinese history scholar Li Yuanhua says that the CCP using
Bethune's foreigner identity to promote itself is very poisonous to its people.

Chinese history scholar Li Yuan Hua: “Bethune is unlike the
propaganda CCP has been promoting.
He does not have the professional ethics of
a good doctor or a surgeon.
So in reality, he is a glossed up model which the Communist
Party created to educate the common people.”

According to Canadian Historian Roderick Stewart and his
wife Sharon, Bethune indulged in sex, has a violent temper, and his marriages repeatedly broke down.

In 1936, Bethune participated in the Spanish Civil War and
built the first historical mobile blood transfusion station.
However, he allowed himself to indulge in sensual pleasures,
abused alcohol, had a violent temper and was forced to leave Spain in the end.
In 1938, Bethune went to China, but old habits die hard,
he was found drunk for several days in a Brothel.

In 1939, Bethune died of septicemia after cutting his finger,
while serving as the army rescue doctor for the CCP.

At the last minute, the CCP got antibiotics and other
medicines.
When officials asked whether the medicine should be used or
not, Bethune answered: “Let's use it. For the sake of our careers, life is also important.”
However, during the relaying of this the sentence became:
“Forget it. For the sake of our careers, life can also be sacrificed.”

After the death of Bethune, Mao Zeding intentionally wrote
an article, flattering Bethune for his sacrifice in the war against Japan. However, Bethune was unknown in Canada.

In reality, Bethune did not die for the anti-Japanese
movement but for the Chinese Communist regime.
The Epoch Times points out that Communist China only
participated in limited battles at the very beginning.
It then concentrated on preparing for the civil war.
What lies behind Bethune's death is the CCP's huge lie.
Faking to resist Japan on the surface but in actuality
expanding its own development.

Li Yuan Hua: “Bethune did not help Chinese people resist the
war, but worked backstage to impede China's war efforts.
He was assisting the Communist Party
on those interference works.
In reality having a negative effect in salvaging
the Chinese Nation and Chinese people.”

In 1976, Canadian government set up Bethune's former
residence and Bethune Memorial.
In 2009, Canadian government invested 2.5 million Canadian
Dollars to build Bethune Residence Visitor Center, from then on causing a series of controversies.

Ye Ke believes this is the result of long term propaganda.
In Mainland China, Bethune has been set in propaganda as a hero.

Ye Ke: “So in this modern time, a lot of countries take hi
popularity into consideration when it comes to economic, and travel benefits.”

Toronto Sun's poll shows more than 80% of the people think
taxpayers should not fund a Memorial for Norman Bethune.