【新唐人2013年05月29日訊】北京「思源社會科學研究中心」總裁曹思源，曾就職於國務院辦公廳，和國家經濟體制改革委員會，他表示，前中共黨魁江澤民的所謂「三個代表」加入《憲法》，是一種「倒退」，應當從《憲法》中挖掉。那麼，《憲法》的精神和制度的設立，用意是甚麼﹖「三個代表」與《憲法》的內容是否相關﹖接下來請看專家的解析：
2000年2月，江澤民在廣東考察工作期間，大談共產黨代表生產力、文化、和人民利益。此後，中共當局不但號召各級黨組織學習所謂「三個代表」，並在全國上下迅速掀起了學習和實踐「三個代表」的所謂精神的熱潮。在江澤民退休時，江的「三個代表」被寫進了中共的《憲法》和《黨章》。
日前，北京「思源社會科學研究中心」總裁曹思源建議，「三個代表」應從《憲法》中挖掉。
北京思源社會科學研究中心總裁曹思源：「《憲法》呀，是一個國家的制度，是確立如何保障人民的權利，和規範公僕的權力，《憲法》性質上不涉及到所謂『三個代表』，與《憲法》無關的內容不應該寫到《憲法》裡去。」
曹思源還表示，「三個代表」應該由人民授權，不能由中共一廂情願的說「代表」就代表了。
曹思源：「不能夠強迫代表﹗嚴格的講這個代表，是必須經過選舉授權的，現在所說的代表是你不讓代表，我也要代表，我代表你說話，你就閉嘴吧﹗你就不要說話，那不行的。我們的言論自由是公民的直接人權，每個人，他都有權利說話，代表，本來是一個很顯見的概念。」
這「三個代表」的理論是怎麼出來的﹖在《真實的江澤民》一書中介紹，時任中共「中央政策研究室」主席特別助理的王滬寧透露，自己是原作者。而書中表示，江澤民著急為自己立碑，想方設法與毛、鄧理論並列，為塑造「第三代理論權威」的形象，讓王滬寧「貢獻」了「三個代表」理論。
時事評論員司馬泰：「本身就不重視《憲法》，不把《憲法》當回事，當成一個自己玩弄的東西，好像自己現在的權力已經坐穩了。他的一套理論，發明一套甚麼東西，弄幾句話放到《憲法》裡去，好像成了共產黨一個傳統。就是看你能不能把你的幾句話寫到《憲法》裡去。關於是甚麼樣的話，他們自己並不在乎。」
今年1月28號，在中共中央政治局會議上，中國新領導人習近平明確表示，要重視從青年工人、農民、知識份子中發展黨員，優化黨員隊伍結構。觀察人士認為，這是第一次從中央的角度拋棄了精英和財閥，等於否定了江澤民的「三個代表」。
美國中文媒體《北京之春》雜誌主編胡平曾表示，中國社會到江澤民下臺的時候，權貴私有化已經是積重難返。在中國社會出現的各種矛盾，貧富差距，官民之間的對立越來越嚴重，一直到胡錦濤時代，都在進一步深化。而只有從這個角度來看江澤民的「三個代表」，才會有一個比較全面的認識。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/薛莉
Remove Jiang's “Three Represents” from the Constitution
Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing Si Yuan Social Science
Research Center said that
it is a “setback” to add the so-called “Three Represents”
by the former CCP leader Jiang Zemin to the Constitution.
The “Three Represents“should be removed
from the Constitution.
What is the intention in setting up the Constitution, and
what is the spirit of “Constitution”?
Is there a relation between the “Three Represents” and
constitutional content? Let's take a look at the experts' analysis.
In February 2000, Jiang Zemin talked about the CCP being
representative of productivity, culture, and people's interests during his inspection tour in Guangdong.
After the inspection tour, CCP authorities called upon
party organizations at all levels to learn the so-called “three represents”
and to quickly set off the spirit of learning and practicing
the “ Three Represents “ across the country.
When Jiang Zemin retired, the “Three Represents“ were
added to the Constitution , and to the CCP's constitution.
A few days ago, Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing
Si Yuan Social Science Research Center suggested that
the “Three Represents” should be removed
from the Constitution.
Cao Siyuan: “The Constitution is a country's system.
It is established to protect people's rights and
regulate the power of public servants.
The Constitution does not relate to the so-called
“Three Represents” in nature.
This irrelevant content should not be added to
the Constitution.”
Cao Siyuan also said that, the “Three Represents”
should be authorized by the people,
instead of being merely being an
expression of the CCP's wishes.
Cao Siyuan: “Representations cannot be forced! Strictly speaking,
this representation must be authorized through elections.
The current representation shows that the CCP must
be representative, whether it is allowed or not.
The CCP speaks on your behalf, and then you shut up!
This does not work if you are not allowed to speak.
Freedom of speech is an undeniable right for any
country's citizens.
Everyone has the right to speak.
Representation is a very clear cut concept.”
How does this “Three Represents” theory come across?
According to the description of the “True Jiang Zemin”,
Wang Huning, Special Assistant to the President in the
CCP's “Central Policy Research Office” revealed that
he is the original author of the “Three Represents”.
“The True Jiang Zemin” says that Jiang was “eager for his
tombstone”, he tried to tie in with Mao and Deng's theories
and to shape the “third generation theoretical authority” image.
Then he allowed Wang Huning to provide a “contribution”
to the “Three Represents“ theory.
Commentator Sima Tai: “The CCP does not attach
importance to the 'Constitution'.
The CCP has treated the constitution as a toy,
instead of as a serious matter. Power is firmly secured now.
Then a theory, something invented or
a few words could be added to the Constitution.
This behavior has become a tradition for the CCP.
The CCP becomes concerned and worried if you can put
a few words you wrote into the Constitution.
They themselves do not care what words you say.”
On January 28 this year, the new CCP leader Xi Jinping
expressed clearly in the Politburo meeting that
attention should be paid to developing CCP members
from youth workers, farmers and intellectuals.
He planned to optimize the structure of CCP membership.
Observers believe that this is the first time an attempt has
been made to remove the elite financial magnates from the CCP Central Committee.
The aim is to deny Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”
any recognition.
Hu Ping, the editor in chief of “Beijing Spring” magazine said
that elite privatization was already deeply embedded in
Chinese society when Jiang Zemin stepped down.
Various contradictions emerged in society, the wealth gap
and the confrontations between the government and the people of China,
became more and more serious leading up
to the Hu Jintao era.
Only from this viewpoint will we have a more comprehensive
understanding of Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”.
2000年2月，江澤民在廣東考察工作期間，大談共產黨代表生產力、文化、和人民利益。此後，中共當局不但號召各級黨組織學習所謂「三個代表」，並在全國上下迅速掀起了學習和實踐「三個代表」的所謂精神的熱潮。在江澤民退休時，江的「三個代表」被寫進了中共的《憲法》和《黨章》。
日前，北京「思源社會科學研究中心」總裁曹思源建議，「三個代表」應從《憲法》中挖掉。
北京思源社會科學研究中心總裁曹思源：「《憲法》呀，是一個國家的制度，是確立如何保障人民的權利，和規範公僕的權力，《憲法》性質上不涉及到所謂『三個代表』，與《憲法》無關的內容不應該寫到《憲法》裡去。」
曹思源還表示，「三個代表」應該由人民授權，不能由中共一廂情願的說「代表」就代表了。
曹思源：「不能夠強迫代表﹗嚴格的講這個代表，是必須經過選舉授權的，現在所說的代表是你不讓代表，我也要代表，我代表你說話，你就閉嘴吧﹗你就不要說話，那不行的。我們的言論自由是公民的直接人權，每個人，他都有權利說話，代表，本來是一個很顯見的概念。」
這「三個代表」的理論是怎麼出來的﹖在《真實的江澤民》一書中介紹，時任中共「中央政策研究室」主席特別助理的王滬寧透露，自己是原作者。而書中表示，江澤民著急為自己立碑，想方設法與毛、鄧理論並列，為塑造「第三代理論權威」的形象，讓王滬寧「貢獻」了「三個代表」理論。
時事評論員司馬泰：「本身就不重視《憲法》，不把《憲法》當回事，當成一個自己玩弄的東西，好像自己現在的權力已經坐穩了。他的一套理論，發明一套甚麼東西，弄幾句話放到《憲法》裡去，好像成了共產黨一個傳統。就是看你能不能把你的幾句話寫到《憲法》裡去。關於是甚麼樣的話，他們自己並不在乎。」
今年1月28號，在中共中央政治局會議上，中國新領導人習近平明確表示，要重視從青年工人、農民、知識份子中發展黨員，優化黨員隊伍結構。觀察人士認為，這是第一次從中央的角度拋棄了精英和財閥，等於否定了江澤民的「三個代表」。
美國中文媒體《北京之春》雜誌主編胡平曾表示，中國社會到江澤民下臺的時候，權貴私有化已經是積重難返。在中國社會出現的各種矛盾，貧富差距，官民之間的對立越來越嚴重，一直到胡錦濤時代，都在進一步深化。而只有從這個角度來看江澤民的「三個代表」，才會有一個比較全面的認識。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/薛莉
Remove Jiang's “Three Represents” from the Constitution
Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing Si Yuan Social Science
Research Center said that
it is a “setback” to add the so-called “Three Represents”
by the former CCP leader Jiang Zemin to the Constitution.
The “Three Represents“should be removed
from the Constitution.
What is the intention in setting up the Constitution, and
what is the spirit of “Constitution”?
Is there a relation between the “Three Represents” and
constitutional content? Let's take a look at the experts' analysis.
In February 2000, Jiang Zemin talked about the CCP being
representative of productivity, culture, and people's interests during his inspection tour in Guangdong.
After the inspection tour, CCP authorities called upon
party organizations at all levels to learn the so-called “three represents”
and to quickly set off the spirit of learning and practicing
the “ Three Represents “ across the country.
When Jiang Zemin retired, the “Three Represents“ were
added to the Constitution , and to the CCP's constitution.
A few days ago, Cao Siyuan, the CEO of Beijing
Si Yuan Social Science Research Center suggested that
the “Three Represents” should be removed
from the Constitution.
Cao Siyuan: “The Constitution is a country's system.
It is established to protect people's rights and
regulate the power of public servants.
The Constitution does not relate to the so-called
“Three Represents” in nature.
This irrelevant content should not be added to
the Constitution.”
Cao Siyuan also said that, the “Three Represents”
should be authorized by the people,
instead of being merely being an
expression of the CCP's wishes.
Cao Siyuan: “Representations cannot be forced! Strictly speaking,
this representation must be authorized through elections.
The current representation shows that the CCP must
be representative, whether it is allowed or not.
The CCP speaks on your behalf, and then you shut up!
This does not work if you are not allowed to speak.
Freedom of speech is an undeniable right for any
country's citizens.
Everyone has the right to speak.
Representation is a very clear cut concept.”
How does this “Three Represents” theory come across?
According to the description of the “True Jiang Zemin”,
Wang Huning, Special Assistant to the President in the
CCP's “Central Policy Research Office” revealed that
he is the original author of the “Three Represents”.
“The True Jiang Zemin” says that Jiang was “eager for his
tombstone”, he tried to tie in with Mao and Deng's theories
and to shape the “third generation theoretical authority” image.
Then he allowed Wang Huning to provide a “contribution”
to the “Three Represents“ theory.
Commentator Sima Tai: “The CCP does not attach
importance to the 'Constitution'.
The CCP has treated the constitution as a toy,
instead of as a serious matter. Power is firmly secured now.
Then a theory, something invented or
a few words could be added to the Constitution.
This behavior has become a tradition for the CCP.
The CCP becomes concerned and worried if you can put
a few words you wrote into the Constitution.
They themselves do not care what words you say.”
On January 28 this year, the new CCP leader Xi Jinping
expressed clearly in the Politburo meeting that
attention should be paid to developing CCP members
from youth workers, farmers and intellectuals.
He planned to optimize the structure of CCP membership.
Observers believe that this is the first time an attempt has
been made to remove the elite financial magnates from the CCP Central Committee.
The aim is to deny Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”
any recognition.
Hu Ping, the editor in chief of “Beijing Spring” magazine said
that elite privatization was already deeply embedded in
Chinese society when Jiang Zemin stepped down.
Various contradictions emerged in society, the wealth gap
and the confrontations between the government and the people of China,
became more and more serious leading up
to the Hu Jintao era.
Only from this viewpoint will we have a more comprehensive
understanding of Jiang Zemin's “Three Represents”.
