【禁聞】抗日名將張靈甫之爭 引中共憂心

2015年01月30日時政
【新唐人2015年1月30日訊】國民黨抗日名將、在國共戰爭中陣亡的張靈甫將軍因遺骨遷葬問題,成為中國大陸網絡討論的熱點。一名中共少將撰文稱,有人將張靈甫抬高為「抗戰名將」,是「項莊舞劍,意在沛公」。但有分析指出,中共不敢公開評價張靈甫,是擔心因此會失去執政的合法性。

抗日將領張靈甫的遺骨,日前被曝出埋在羊圈後,張靈甫的後人希望將其遺骨遷葬陝西家鄉,不過卻遭到遺骨埋葬地的農戶,索取20萬人民幣的所謂鑑定費。

這條消息在大陸網絡上瘋傳,有不少網友稱讚張靈甫在抗戰期間多次參與重大戰役,「痛擊日寇、戰功彪炳」。

旅美原大陸歷史學教授劉因全:「他在抗日戰爭時期,打了許多勝戰,消滅了許多日寇,在這個方面,我們應該給他稱讚肯定。抗日戰爭是一個反法西斯戰爭,也是個民族戰爭,是進行保家衛國的,因為日本軍國主義者,是侵略中國的,張靈甫在這個時候發揮了很大的作用,在這方面戰功卓著,當然就是民族英雄。」

26號,中共中央機關報《人民日報》旗下《環球時報》,刊登國防大學教授徐焰少將的評論文章。文章稱,有些人不忘「借題發揮」,走向某種極端。張靈甫雖然抗日有功,但並未指揮過大的會戰,將其拔高為「名將」,連當年的參戰者也感到驚訝。而且,張靈甫積極參加內戰,進攻解放區之過,是不能掩蓋的。

原陝西電視臺記者馬曉明:「他在抗戰中間確實是有過非常英勇的戰績,也是有過非常突出的戰功,他在民族抗戰的功績,就連共產黨也是不否認的。至於說到在與共產黨軍隊作戰中間的戰功、戰績,共產黨自然不會對他的戰功做正面的評價,肯定(說)他是一個罪人,是反共的軍人這種身份。要在中國大陸公正的評價張靈甫的功過,現在還不是時候。」

文章還認為,近來一些輿論拔高張靈甫,是「一種政治鬥爭手段」,是想藉此來否定當年的革命戰爭和建立中共政權的合理性。

針對徐焰這篇評論文章,英國廣播公司《BBC》報導指出,中國大陸「崇拜民國」的所謂「國粉」,顯然讓中共軍方感到擔心。

旅美原大陸歷史學教授劉因全表示,無論是在對日抗戰或國共內戰,張靈甫都是一個民族英雄。

劉因全:「共產黨在中國發展起來,它是為了把中國變成蘇維埃的一部分。他們佔領了中國以後,就在中國施行所謂的共產主義、社會主義,結果把中國搞得專制、獨裁,餓死那麼多人,屠殺了那麼多善良正直的人,給中華民族帶來了很大的災難,張將軍在抵抗中共的這種荼毒的時候,發揮了很大的作用,當然也是民族英雄。」

據了解,在8年的對日抗戰中,蔣介石領導的中華民國政府,發動了大型會戰22次,像臺兒莊這樣的重要戰役1,127次,國軍206位將軍壯烈殉國,陸軍傷亡321萬多名官兵,海軍艦艇全部打光,空軍4,321名飛行員犧牲,2,468架戰機被擊落。台灣投資中國受害者協會理事長高為邦表示,對日抗戰是國民黨打的,中共讓國民黨軍隊去犧牲,他們保持實力等著「收成」。

劉因全指出,如果實事求是的評價這段歷史,評價張靈甫將軍,大陸民眾就會認識到,中共不具有執政合法性。

劉因全:「在整個的抗日戰爭期間,共產黨沒有打幾個戰,所以共產黨一直歪曲這段歷史。包括對張將軍的評價,就是掩蓋歷史的一部分。」

據《大紀元新聞網》署名林輝的文章描述,中共口中的「平型關戰役」,實際參戰的是國民黨第十五軍,而被安排協同作戰的中共軍隊卻是戰場上的逃兵。為了掩飾他們的逃跑,欺騙世人,中共黨史肆意篡改,大肆吹噓中共取得了「平型關大捷」。

有網友在網易論壇中說,確實有戰績的戰士被拔高是「項莊舞劍」,到底還有沒有是非觀?這位網友表示,要說項莊舞劍,也是為了民族正義。今天人們一邊倒的歌頌他們,是國民的覺悟。

採訪/朱智善 編輯/陳潔


Renowned General of The Anti-Japan War
Causing Concerns For The Regime.

The relocation of general Zhang Lingfu's remains
has become a hot topic among Chinese netizens.
Zhang Lingfu was a renowned Anti-Japanese War General
of the National Party (KMT).
He died during the war between KMT and
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
A CCP Major wrote an article praising Zhang Lingfu as the
"Renowned Anti-Japanese War Hero has special intentions."
Some pointed out the CCP dare not have a fair evaluation
of Zhang Lingfu, as it is worried about its own legitimacy.
Zhang Lingfu's remains were recently discovered
in a sheepfold.
Zhang Lingfu's descendants want the remains
to be moved to his home in Shaanxi Province.
However local farmers request an "appraisal"
fee of 200,000 yuan.

This piece of news has spread widely on the internet.

Netizens praised Zhang Lingfu's participation in many
major battles.
He also "attacked the Japanese invaders
and won many encounters."

U.S. based former professor of history Liu Yinquan, "Zhang
won many battles during the Anti-Japanese War.
He eliminated many Japanese invaders. In this regard,
we should definitely praise him.
The Anti-Japanese War was a war against fascism,
as well as a war to fight for our nation.
Japan was invading China; he was protecting our homeland.
He played a big role in this and for sure he is a national hero."

On Jan. 26 the CCP media Global Times published an article
written by National Defense University professor Xu Yan
Major. The article said that some people remembered to
"state their intentions" through some extreme motives.
Although Zhang Lingfu won exploits during the Anti-
Japanese War, he did not command any large battles.
Overstating him as a renowned general would even
shock participants of these battles.
Zhang Lingfu was also active in the civil war against
the CCP. These things cannot be covered up.

Former Shaanxi TV Station reporter Ma Xiaoming, "He
was very brave in fighting during the Anti-Japanese War.
He also won prominent military exploits. Even the CCP
cannot deny his contribution in fighting for our nation.
As for the exploits he won during the war against the CCP,
the CCP won't have any positive evaluation on these.
The CCP has him as a sinner and an anti-communist soldier.

It is not the right time to have a positive emulation
over Zhang Lingfu's merits."

The article also states that overstating Zhang Lingfu is
"a means of political struggle" to deny the rationality of
the Revolutionary War and the CCP regime.

One BBC report pointed out Xu Yan's article reveals the
CCP's concern over peoples' enthusiasm of the national
government and fans of the KMT.

Liu Yinquan said that Zhang Lingfu is a national hero for
his feats in both war against Japan and the the civil war.

Liu Yinquan, "The CCP had the intention to turn China
into part of the Soviet Union.
Once it ruled China, the CCP implemented the so-called
communism and socialism, and turned China into a country
of autocracy and dictatorship. Many people died of starvation.

Many kind people were killed.
The CCP brought so many disasters to the Chinese nation.
General Zhang played a huge role in fighting with the CCP.
Of course he is a national hero."

It is understood that during the eight year Anti-Japanese War,
the Republic of China government led by Chiang Kai-shek
launched 22 large-scale battles and 1,127 battles similar to
the famous Taierzhuang Battle.
206 generals died, over 3.21 million army soldiers died,
all naval ships were lost.
4,321 Air Force pilots died, 2,468 aircrafts were shot down.

Taiwanese Investment in China Victims Association
CEO Gao Weibang said the Anti-Japanese War was
done by the KMT. The CCP let the KMT troops
sacrifice themselves while they waited to "harvest."

Liu Yingquang pointed out a fair evaluation on this piece
of history and General Zhang Lingfu will help people in
China recognize that the CCP government does not have
legitimacy for the country.

Liu Yinquang, "During the entire Anti-Japanese War, the
CCP did not carry out many battles against the Japanese.
The CCP has been trying to distort this part of history.

Its evaluation of General Zhang is part of the effort
to cover up history."

An article on The Epoch Times News Network written
by Lin Hu, revealed that The Battle of Pingxingguan
praised by the CCP was actually by the KMT 15th Army.

The CCP army arranged to assist the battle
acted as deserters on the battlefield.
In order to cover up their escape and deceive the world
CCP history books deliberately distort history by praising
the CCP for gaining the Pingxingguan victory.

Some netizens said praising soldiers with real feats were
labeled as "special intention." Is there right and wrong?
The special intention is to have justice for the nation.
Praise of these heroes show the people are awakening.

Interview/Zhu Zhishan Edit/ChenJie