【新唐人2014年08月21日讯】闹出“炫富女”郭美美风波的中国红十字会，日前再陷诚信危机。有媒体披露，中共当局斥资上亿元人民币兴建的救灾物资仓库，被红十字总会用“以捐代租”的方式，低价出租牟利。分析指出，中共操控的中国红会，自然带有专制政权的腐败特征，不足为奇。
据大陆《腾讯财经》网站8月18号报导，这座占地近百亩的仓库位于北京顺义区，是第一个国家级备灾救灾物资仓库，已建成4年，隶属于“中国红十字会总会备灾救灾中心”。
不过，报导说，这个仓库并没有得到合理利用。报导引述知情人士的话指出，“红会”通过两份“阴阳合同”，并利用“以捐代租”方式，将这个仓库以每年90万元的价格出租给“北京中迅誉华商业管理公司”，这家公司再以每年450万的市场价，将仓库转租给“DHL”等物流公司，从中赚取360万的差价。
那么，“中迅誉华”为何能低价承租备灾仓库呢？工商资料显示，“中迅誉华”成立于2012年3月，注册资本100万元，分别由魏中华、阚茜出资。“中迅誉华”疑似“空壳公司”，因为曾经注册的两个地址都是假的，而且，阚茜是“中华社会文化发展基金会红色文化基金管委会”常务副主任、及秘书长，而魏中华则是“红色文化基金管理部”主任。
原河北人民广播电台编辑朱欣欣：“国际上大部分的慈善事业，主要还是由民间的、社会的团体，自发的搞比较好，自愿自发，而且互相有一个监督，有一个公开透明的机制。在中国，主要的慈善组织都被官方所控制，它就不同程度的沾染这种特权，专制政权那种腐败的特征，就会利用这个事业来牟私。”
消息曝光后，“红会”常务副会长赵白鸽做出解释，她说，出租仓库是“为了解决经费不足，要挣钱养活员工”，但仍有民众质疑，仓库为何低价出租？是否存在利益输送？
据了解，中共中纪委已介入调查这起事件。
大陆维权人士张海涛：“红会这个名称就是个盗版，因为中国的红会根本不隶属于国际红会，它不接受国际红会的那种管理方法，它没有国际红会那种财务公开透明那种管理方法，这就决定了中国红会就是一个不受监管的机构，因为有这个前提，它会出现很多问题。”
“红会”违规出租引发热烈讨论，报导迅速被各媒体转载，但数小时后，相关报导被全网删除。
大陆网民说，中国“红十字会”已变成“黑十字会”，没得救了，再也不能将责任推给郭美美。
湖南女子郭美美，2011年6月在“新浪微博”大秀豪宅、跑车、名牌包，网友发现她的认证身份是“中国红十字会商业总经理”，质疑捐款遭到挪用，事件引发轩然大波。
张海涛：“中国红会是因郭美美事件曝露了很多问题，但是它的全部问题不只是郭美美事件曝露出来的，比如这次披露的仓库，它出了这个事情以后，平面媒体没有一家敢报导，网路上报导的也都被封杀了，这就说明了红会不敢公开透明，接受人民监管。”
原中国“太平洋保险公司”高级职员李学慧指出，在中国，政治丑闻太多。
原中国太平洋保险公司高级职员李学慧：“即便我身边周边的事情，很多很多都是不可见光的。我们曾经做过一个要求﹕国家财政部公布援助朝鲜资金的项目，它后来归结一个﹕国家秘密，立案开庭，后来又不开庭了。这个社会完全是个邪恶，百分之九十五的欺骗，加上百分之五的暴力，红会的丑闻根本就构不成丑闻，离我们政治中心的丑闻还远的很。”
最近，中共党媒《新华网》、《人民网》、《央视》大肆起底郭美美卖淫、赌博、被包养等细节，一些网友认为，中共在洗白“红会”，也有网友指出，在新疆暴力杀人、崑山爆炸、湘潭自焚、云南地震的紧要关头，党的喉舌一系列刷屏郭美美，是在转移民众视线。
采访/陈汉 编辑/陈洁 后制/葛雷
China Red Cross Swindling Donations?
China Red Cross runs into another crisis recently after the
incident of its celebrity Guo Meimei was arrested for gambling.
Chinese media exposed that a warehouse that cost more than
100 million yuan to build for storing relief supplies was leased
out by China Red Cross at a low price for private business purposes.
This corrupt commercialism of a relief supplies warehouse
is not surprising since China Red Cross is controlled by the
CCP and is certainly harboring the same corrupt characteristics.
The Chinese Internet portal, Tencent Finance, revealed in its
Aug. 18 report that the first national disaster preparedness
and response center belonged to the China Red Cross (CRC).
And it was built four years ago in the Shunyi District of Beijing.
But this center has not been properly used.
The report quoted informed sources as saying that the CRC
leases the warehouse to a purse company in Beijing at a yearly
rate of 900,000 yuan in the guise of a donation to CRC.
The purse company subleases the warehouse to various logistics
companies such as DHL at the market price of 4.5 million
yearly rate. The net profit is a staggering 3.6 million yuan.
Why can the purse company rent the center at such a cheap
price?
Public information of the purse company revealed that the
company was established in March 2012 with registered capital
of 1 million yuan funded by Wei Zhonghua and Kan Qian.
It is suspected of being a bogus company. The two registered
addresses were fake.
Kan Qian and Wei Zhonghua are respectively, the deputy
director and director of Red Culture fund management department
of China Foundation for the Development of Social Culture.
Former Hebei People's Radio Editor Zhu Xinxin: "Most of the
international charities are run by civil society groups.
It is spontaneous and voluntary and there is a mutual
supervision with an open and transparent mechanism.
In China, however, the majority of charitable organizations
are officially controlled.
It is inevitable that they are contaminated with varying degrees of
privilege. The corrupt authoritarian will exploit the charity
to seek private profit."
CRC vice president Zhao Beige explained tht the rental was
meant to solve the insufficient fund to "feed so many employees."
But the low leasing rate is suspected
of transferring of interest.
It is understood that the Central Commission for Discipline
Inspection has investigated the incident.
Activist Zhang Haitao: "China Red Cross is a piracy.
It does not belong to the International Red Cross and it does
not obey the management of the International Red Cross, such as
financial disclosure and transparent management.
China Red Cross is an unregulated institution.
Under this premise, problems are bound to happen."
The CRC's violation of leasing the relief center was quickly
and widely reported following Tencent's report.
But, within just a few hours, all relevant reports were deleted
from online media because of its relation to the Red Culture
Foundation which is under the CCP propaganda agency.
Chinese netizens commented that the CRC has become the
China Black Cross, which is hopeless and can no longer pass
the buck to Guo Meimei.
The Hunan native Guo Meimei started to show off her mansion,
sports cars, designer bags, and so forth in June 2011 on the Internet.
She was identified as being the China Red Cross commercial
general manager.
She is suspected of having misappropriated donations,
and triggered uproar.
Zhang Haitao: "Guo Meimei's case has exposed many problems
of China Red Cross.
But CRC has more problems than just the Guo Meimei incident.
The relief center's news was exposed, but only online.
None of the print media dare to report it. Even the online report
was blocked.
That tells us that the CRC does not dare to be open and transparent
or accept people's supervision."
Former China Pacific Insurance Group officer Li Xuehui
points out, political scandals are immense in China.
Li Xuehui: "Even things surrounding me consist of many
shady realities.
Once, we required the Ministry of Finance to disclose
information on the funding assistance project to North Korea.
It was later concluded: Confidential and filing to court.
But, the hearing never took place.
This society is plainly evil, with 95 percent of deception
and 5 percent of violence.
China Red Cross scandal is no scandal
compared to the political scandals."
Recently, CCP media such as Xinhua, People's Daily, CCTV
engaged in detailed reports on Guo Meimei's prostitution,
gambling, and being a mistress.
It is believed to be a white wash of the CRC.
Netizens also suspect that the party media's reports of Guo Meimei
were simply diverting the focus off the domestic disasters:
such as Xinjiang Xinjiang violence, Kunshan explosion,
Xiangtan self-immolation, and Yunnan earthquake.
Interview/ChenHan Edit/ChenJie Post-Production/GeLei
据大陆《腾讯财经》网站8月18号报导，这座占地近百亩的仓库位于北京顺义区，是第一个国家级备灾救灾物资仓库，已建成4年，隶属于“中国红十字会总会备灾救灾中心”。
不过，报导说，这个仓库并没有得到合理利用。报导引述知情人士的话指出，“红会”通过两份“阴阳合同”，并利用“以捐代租”方式，将这个仓库以每年90万元的价格出租给“北京中迅誉华商业管理公司”，这家公司再以每年450万的市场价，将仓库转租给“DHL”等物流公司，从中赚取360万的差价。
那么，“中迅誉华”为何能低价承租备灾仓库呢？工商资料显示，“中迅誉华”成立于2012年3月，注册资本100万元，分别由魏中华、阚茜出资。“中迅誉华”疑似“空壳公司”，因为曾经注册的两个地址都是假的，而且，阚茜是“中华社会文化发展基金会红色文化基金管委会”常务副主任、及秘书长，而魏中华则是“红色文化基金管理部”主任。
原河北人民广播电台编辑朱欣欣：“国际上大部分的慈善事业，主要还是由民间的、社会的团体，自发的搞比较好，自愿自发，而且互相有一个监督，有一个公开透明的机制。在中国，主要的慈善组织都被官方所控制，它就不同程度的沾染这种特权，专制政权那种腐败的特征，就会利用这个事业来牟私。”
消息曝光后，“红会”常务副会长赵白鸽做出解释，她说，出租仓库是“为了解决经费不足，要挣钱养活员工”，但仍有民众质疑，仓库为何低价出租？是否存在利益输送？
据了解，中共中纪委已介入调查这起事件。
大陆维权人士张海涛：“红会这个名称就是个盗版，因为中国的红会根本不隶属于国际红会，它不接受国际红会的那种管理方法，它没有国际红会那种财务公开透明那种管理方法，这就决定了中国红会就是一个不受监管的机构，因为有这个前提，它会出现很多问题。”
“红会”违规出租引发热烈讨论，报导迅速被各媒体转载，但数小时后，相关报导被全网删除。
大陆网民说，中国“红十字会”已变成“黑十字会”，没得救了，再也不能将责任推给郭美美。
湖南女子郭美美，2011年6月在“新浪微博”大秀豪宅、跑车、名牌包，网友发现她的认证身份是“中国红十字会商业总经理”，质疑捐款遭到挪用，事件引发轩然大波。
张海涛：“中国红会是因郭美美事件曝露了很多问题，但是它的全部问题不只是郭美美事件曝露出来的，比如这次披露的仓库，它出了这个事情以后，平面媒体没有一家敢报导，网路上报导的也都被封杀了，这就说明了红会不敢公开透明，接受人民监管。”
原中国“太平洋保险公司”高级职员李学慧指出，在中国，政治丑闻太多。
原中国太平洋保险公司高级职员李学慧：“即便我身边周边的事情，很多很多都是不可见光的。我们曾经做过一个要求﹕国家财政部公布援助朝鲜资金的项目，它后来归结一个﹕国家秘密，立案开庭，后来又不开庭了。这个社会完全是个邪恶，百分之九十五的欺骗，加上百分之五的暴力，红会的丑闻根本就构不成丑闻，离我们政治中心的丑闻还远的很。”
最近，中共党媒《新华网》、《人民网》、《央视》大肆起底郭美美卖淫、赌博、被包养等细节，一些网友认为，中共在洗白“红会”，也有网友指出，在新疆暴力杀人、崑山爆炸、湘潭自焚、云南地震的紧要关头，党的喉舌一系列刷屏郭美美，是在转移民众视线。
采访/陈汉 编辑/陈洁 后制/葛雷
China Red Cross Swindling Donations?
China Red Cross runs into another crisis recently after the
incident of its celebrity Guo Meimei was arrested for gambling.
Chinese media exposed that a warehouse that cost more than
100 million yuan to build for storing relief supplies was leased
out by China Red Cross at a low price for private business purposes.
This corrupt commercialism of a relief supplies warehouse
is not surprising since China Red Cross is controlled by the
CCP and is certainly harboring the same corrupt characteristics.
The Chinese Internet portal, Tencent Finance, revealed in its
Aug. 18 report that the first national disaster preparedness
and response center belonged to the China Red Cross (CRC).
And it was built four years ago in the Shunyi District of Beijing.
But this center has not been properly used.
The report quoted informed sources as saying that the CRC
leases the warehouse to a purse company in Beijing at a yearly
rate of 900,000 yuan in the guise of a donation to CRC.
The purse company subleases the warehouse to various logistics
companies such as DHL at the market price of 4.5 million
yearly rate. The net profit is a staggering 3.6 million yuan.
Why can the purse company rent the center at such a cheap
price?
Public information of the purse company revealed that the
company was established in March 2012 with registered capital
of 1 million yuan funded by Wei Zhonghua and Kan Qian.
It is suspected of being a bogus company. The two registered
addresses were fake.
Kan Qian and Wei Zhonghua are respectively, the deputy
director and director of Red Culture fund management department
of China Foundation for the Development of Social Culture.
Former Hebei People's Radio Editor Zhu Xinxin: "Most of the
international charities are run by civil society groups.
It is spontaneous and voluntary and there is a mutual
supervision with an open and transparent mechanism.
In China, however, the majority of charitable organizations
are officially controlled.
It is inevitable that they are contaminated with varying degrees of
privilege. The corrupt authoritarian will exploit the charity
to seek private profit."
CRC vice president Zhao Beige explained tht the rental was
meant to solve the insufficient fund to "feed so many employees."
But the low leasing rate is suspected
of transferring of interest.
It is understood that the Central Commission for Discipline
Inspection has investigated the incident.
Activist Zhang Haitao: "China Red Cross is a piracy.
It does not belong to the International Red Cross and it does
not obey the management of the International Red Cross, such as
financial disclosure and transparent management.
China Red Cross is an unregulated institution.
Under this premise, problems are bound to happen."
The CRC's violation of leasing the relief center was quickly
and widely reported following Tencent's report.
But, within just a few hours, all relevant reports were deleted
from online media because of its relation to the Red Culture
Foundation which is under the CCP propaganda agency.
Chinese netizens commented that the CRC has become the
China Black Cross, which is hopeless and can no longer pass
the buck to Guo Meimei.
The Hunan native Guo Meimei started to show off her mansion,
sports cars, designer bags, and so forth in June 2011 on the Internet.
She was identified as being the China Red Cross commercial
general manager.
She is suspected of having misappropriated donations,
and triggered uproar.
Zhang Haitao: "Guo Meimei's case has exposed many problems
of China Red Cross.
But CRC has more problems than just the Guo Meimei incident.
The relief center's news was exposed, but only online.
None of the print media dare to report it. Even the online report
was blocked.
That tells us that the CRC does not dare to be open and transparent
or accept people's supervision."
Former China Pacific Insurance Group officer Li Xuehui
points out, political scandals are immense in China.
Li Xuehui: "Even things surrounding me consist of many
shady realities.
Once, we required the Ministry of Finance to disclose
information on the funding assistance project to North Korea.
It was later concluded: Confidential and filing to court.
But, the hearing never took place.
This society is plainly evil, with 95 percent of deception
and 5 percent of violence.
China Red Cross scandal is no scandal
compared to the political scandals."
Recently, CCP media such as Xinhua, People's Daily, CCTV
engaged in detailed reports on Guo Meimei's prostitution,
gambling, and being a mistress.
It is believed to be a white wash of the CRC.
Netizens also suspect that the party media's reports of Guo Meimei
were simply diverting the focus off the domestic disasters:
such as Xinjiang Xinjiang violence, Kunshan explosion,
Xiangtan self-immolation, and Yunnan earthquake.
Interview/ChenHan Edit/ChenJie Post-Production/GeLei
