【禁聞】大陸官媒壓制網絡 網民集體反攻

【新唐人2012年12月25日訊】大陸官媒壓制網絡 網民集體反攻

最近,大陸多家官方媒體大造輿論,釋放加強網絡監管信號,遭到許多民眾的強烈抗議。 12月23號,《中青報》又發表署名文章《別將“法治”誤讀為“管制”》,再次引起網友的強烈反彈,痛斥官媒:「不怕把法治當管制,就怕把管制當法治!」

《中青報》的文章被《人民日報》、新浪微博轉載後,立刻引來潮水般的批評聲浪。

有人質疑說:「肆意加密、刪帖、封號,濫設敏感詞,這是法治呢還是管制?最高法規定,涉及刪帖、封號等互聯網訴訟案件,法院一律不予受理,這到底是法治呢還是管制?」

還有人調侃說,「《人民日報》是黨的喉舌,網絡微博是人民的喉舌。黨的喉舌可以管制人民的喉舌。」

而官方對網友的反對聲音,則採取慣用的報復手段,刪貼和封號。連中國「政法大學」教授何兵也發帖諷刺說,「和你討論的貼子被封,你贏了。」

不過,大陸民眾的反對之聲,並沒有對中共管制網絡的決定帶來絲毫影響。據大陸媒體報導,中共人大常委會第三十次會議,12月24號將審議關於加強網絡信息保護的決定草案。

英媒:愛國教育扭曲中國人世界觀

英國《金融時報》12月24號刊登文章,指出中共推行的所謂「愛國主義教育」扭曲了中國人的世界觀。

文章說,1989年的天安門事件,以及前蘇聯與東歐社會主義陣營解體,讓中共最高領導人得出結論,中共應該加強對共產主義信仰的教育,因此發起一場延續至今的新的愛國主義教育運動。

作者在文章中說,有選擇的講述歷史,強調外國侵略者侵佔中國領土時的兇狠殘忍,對中國統治者的錯誤缺點避而不談,是為了用遭受西方侵略的歷史,來培養年輕人的民族主義精神。

文章指出,這一輪新的思想教育運動,導致中國人對中國的看法,與國際社會截然不同。

數千訪民冒嚴寒申訴立案

《美國之音》報導, 12月24號,來自大陸各地的數以千計的訪民,從上午開始冒著30年不遇的嚴寒,在北京的國家信訪局、最高法院、最高檢察院等國家機關上訪伸冤,希望在2012年的最後幾天能登記上屬於今年的立案。

報導說,有訪民表示,再過7天立案就屬於2013年的,所以在2012年的最後幾個工作日,無論天氣多嚴酷,都要堅持申訴立案。

許多訪民高喊「和諧社會無家可歸、公安造假法院枉法、打倒腐敗、還我家園」等口號。

編輯/周玉林


Netizens Against China”s Internet Control

Recently, several state media in mainland China constantly
published articles to encourage Internet control.
Many netizens are strongly opposed to this.

On Dec. 23rd, China Youth Daily newspaper published
an article saying “Don”t mix the rule of law with control”.
This again caused a furious response from netizens.

Netizens shouted out: “Not afraid of the rule of law,
but fear of using control as the law.”

China Youth Daily”s article was circulated on People”s Daily,
and Sina microblog. Immediately came a wave of condemnation.

People questioned: “To deliberately encrypt, deleting posts,
blocking user accounts and censoring words.
Is it rule of law or forcible control?

The law regulation said that any case involving Internet
disputes such as deleting posts and blocking user accounts,
then the court won”t accept the case. Is it the rule of law
or forcible control questioned the people.

Some people said, “People”s Daily is the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece.
The Internet microblog is the peoples” mouthpiece.
The CCP mouthpiece can control the peoples” mouthpiece!”

The CCP reaction is to take revenge by deleting posts and
blocking user accounts.
Professor He Bing at China University of Political Science
and Law said “Posts that replied to your forum discussion were deleted, you won.”

Unfortunately, voices from netizens didn”t affect
the CCP”s decision to control the Internet.
The mainland China media reported that, on Dec 24th, the
Standing Committee 30th session will decide draft regulation on Internet protection.

Financial Times: Patriotic Education
Distorts China World View

On Dec. 24th, British Financial Times reported that
“Patriotic Education Distorts China World View”.

The article said that Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989 and
the fall of the Soviet Union made China”s leaders conclude
that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) needed to improve
its “thought work”.
So they launched a new “patriotic education”
campaign that continues to this today.

The article said the selective teaching of history emphasizes
brutality of foreign invaders and ignores atrocities or mistakes
by China”s leaders, which is intended to boost the CCP”s
legitimacy creating nationalism among young Chinese.

The article pointed out this campaign caused the disconnection
between how the world views China and how China sees itself.

Thousands of Petitioners Appealing in Beijing

Voice of America reported on the morning of Dec.24th,
in the severe cold weather, thousands of petitioners from all China came to Beijing.
They appealed to Beijing Hearing Complaints
and Grievances Bureau and Supreme Court.
They wanted to register their cases before the end of the year.

The report said petitioners had to register the case now or
seven days later it would belong to year 2013”s case load.
So, in the last few days of 2012, no matter how bad
the weather, they tried hard to register their cases.

Many petitioners shouted out “Homeless in harmonious
society, and “police are fraud, the court abuse law”
and “down with corruption, return my homeland.”