【新唐人2015年02月05日讯】中共党刊《求是网》发表中共社科院“专家”朱继东的文章，指中共教育部部长袁贵仁发表“禁止西方教材进入课堂”言论遭到“围攻”，是因为“围攻者”“没有得到应有惩处”。这番话引发外界关注。有人认为是不是文革再现？随后朱继东也被网友起底。
中共教育部部长袁贵仁的“禁止西方教材进入课堂”的论调，激起网路媒体挞伐声浪。不过，这几天中共官方媒体纷纷跳出来为袁贵仁站台撑腰。党刊《求是》杂志更是连续两天发文力挺袁贵仁。
中国社科院国家文化安全与意识形态建设研究中心，副主任兼秘书长朱继东，2月3号在中共期刊《求是》发表文章，声称袁贵仁的言行是职责所在，遭到围攻的最根本原因是，“这些参与围攻者近年来屡次围攻在意识形态领域敢于亮剑者，并且没有得到应有惩处。”
朱继东还说，“一定要敢于拔钉子，对那些经常发表攻击党和社会主义的言论的教师要坚决清除。”
外界分析，朱继东文章中的言辞，让人联想起中国的文化大革命，“清除和严惩”批评教育部长的学者和教师，等于是退回文革甚至反右时代。
英国广播公司《BBC》，引用香港科技大学教授丁学良教授的观点表示，自从左派政治代表人物薄熙来倒台之后，中国政界、意识形态及有关领域中的这类“吆喝者”，失去了一个重要领军人物，他们发表这类文革式极左言论，正是在做“政治风险投资”。
中国宪政学者 陈永苗：“我觉得中国的知识份子，因为受到文革的迫害之后，在后面对中国所有的问题看的都是很不理性的，都是用惊弓之鸟的心态，然后弓弦一响他们就觉得文革要来了。”
东南大学法学院教授 张赞宁：“我想是不可能的，因为文化大革命不得民心，它是没有市场的，现在在提倡想恢覆文革时期的那种做法的那些人，主要是极少数既得利益集团的人在那里鼓噪，像以薄熙来为主的这群人，当然这个我们不能掉以轻心，现在文革阴魂不散，如果我们掉以轻心的话，也就是文革在中国重演不是没有可能的。”
此前，袁贵仁在一次高校领导人座谈会上说，绝不能让传播西方价值观念的教材进入大学课堂，决不允许各种攻击诽谤党的领导、抹黑社会主义的言论在大学课堂出现，决不允许教师在课堂上发牢骚、泄怨气。
袁贵仁一席话，激起千层浪。
东南大学法学院教授 张赞宁：“我想，这些陈腔滥调在中国是没有市场，现在还有人在讲甚么马列主义、毛泽东思想，但是他一方面又要讲马列主义，一方面又要抵制西方甚么思想影响，其实马列主义就是西方的，这个陈腔滥调根本是很矛盾的。”
对于袁贵仁的言论，北京大学法学院副院长沈岿提出三问，包括如何区分“西方价值”和“中国价值”、如何区分“攻击诽谤党的领导、抹黑社会主义”和“反思党曾经走过的弯路、揭露黑暗现实”、如何让其领导的教育部贯彻执行依宪治国依法治国的方针。
此后，网络上引起激烈争议。
朱继东在文中点名，“三问袁贵仁”的某大学法学院教授，和他同一学院的一位大V教授，是进一步“煽风点火，制造了思想混乱”。
被朱继东隐射批评的法律学者贺卫方2月3号下午，在个人认证微博发声回应朱继东，“不知他指的是哪一位？其中‘屡屡发表攻击党和社会主义的言论’，那些言论？证据何在？”
贺卫方还质问，可否先规定领导人子女不到西方国家留学？
当天晚上，贺卫方再发微博，称发现朱继东“乃当年为薄的重庆模式摇旗呐喊的活跃人物，新华网前记者”，并附上一篇发表在新华网上、题为《专家聚焦重庆“唱读讲传”活动：值得借鉴和推广》的报导，报导中多张照片的摄影和主文记者都署名“朱继东”。
不过，《求是》也承认，袁贵仁的观点并非仅代表其个人，网上一些人表面上看是攻击袁贵仁，实质是藉机表达对中共的不满。
采访/朱智善 编辑/黄亿美 后制/舒灿
Communist Mouthpiece Supports Ban of Western Values
Communist mouthpiece Qiushi (www.qstheory.cn) published
a comment by Chinese Academy of Social Sciences scholar,
Zhu Jidong.
He says the attackers of Yuan Guiren have not received
the punishment they deserved.
Yuan, the head of the Ministry of Education, previously
tried to ban Western textbooks in China's classrooms.
Some wonder if it's another wave of the Cultural Revolution.
Netizens also revealed Zhu Jidong's background.
Much criticism has been seen both online and in the media
on the recent comment by Yuan Guiren, China's Minister of
Education: "No Western textbooks are allowed in class."
But the regime's official media have voiced their support.
In particular, pro-Yuan articles have appeared in the Party
magazine, Qiushi, for two consecutive days.
Zhu Jidong, Party secretary of the Academy of Marxism
of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,
published an article on Qiushi on Feb. 3,
claiming that Yuan was fulfilling his duty as minister.
Zhu stated, "We must dare to 'pull nails'; we must resolutely
clear out those teachers who attack the Party and socialism."
The comment has reminded some of the Cultural Revolution.
Zhu's suggestion to "clear and punish" those who criticize
the minister of education is like going "back to the era of
Cultural Revolution or even the anti-rightist", said the BBC.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Professor,
Ding Xueliang told the BBC that a ringleader of the politically
correct ideology within the regime has fallen along with
the leftist Bo Xilai.
This cultural revolutionary type of extreme-leftist remark
is a "risky investment."
Chinese constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao: "I think
the Chinese intellectuals are irrational on the Chinese issues.
"They have been frightened by the persecution
during the Cultural Revolution.
"A little noise seems to signal to them
the return of the Cultural Revolution."
Zhang Zanning, Professor, Southeastern Univ. Law School:
"I think it is impossible—the Cultural Revolution is against
the people's interest and has no market.
"Those who promote the ideology of the Cultural Revolution
are the very few with vested interests, such as Bo Xilai etc.
"Of course, we can't take it lightly; the Cultural Revolution
still lingers and we must keep it from reoccurring."
Previously, Yuan Guiren had addressed at a forum
of university leaders that no textbooks of Western values
were allowed on campus; no remarks that attack, criticize
or defame China's leadership nor socialism were allowed;
and no teachers were allowed to vent their complaints
or anger on this in class.
Yuan's words stirred people.
Professor Zhang Zanning: "I think these clichés have no
market in China; no one believes in Marxism-Leninism
or in Mao Zedong's Thought.
"He talked about Marxism-Leninism on one hand,
and about resisting Western ideologies on the other,
but Marxism-Leninism came from the West,
so his remark was completely contradictory."
Professor Shen Kui from Peking University Law School posed
three questions against Yuan's address:
How to differentiate between Western values
and Chinese values; how to differentiate between
'attacking Party leadership and socialism' and 'reflecting on
the Party's mistakes and exposing the dark reality';
and how the Ministry of Education would implement
the principle of the rule of law and rule of Constitution.
Vigorous Internet debates have thus started.
Zhu Jidong responded in his article by referring to Shen Kui's
questions, and his colleagues have "fanned the flames
and caused ideological confusion."
Zhu's colleague, law professor He Weifang, responded to Zhu
on Feb. 3 through his certified Weibo account, saying,
"Not sure who he's referring to. As for 'remarks attacking
the Party and socialism', which ones? Is there evidence?"
He Weifang also criticized Zhu, suggesting that he instead
regulate leaders to not send their children abroad to study.
On the same day, He Weifang issued another blog
claiming new evidence.
In a report of Xinhua News Agency, He found Zhu Jidong's
identity as a news reporter, cheering Bo's Chongqing model.
A report by Zhu Jidong with many photos was attached
as evidence.
However, Qiushi admitted that Yuan Guiren's views
were not solely his own; the attacks on Yuan were personal
on the surface, but reflected the complaints of people
against the CCP regime.
Interview/Zhu Zhishan Edit/Huang Yimei Post-Production/ShuCan
中共教育部部长袁贵仁的“禁止西方教材进入课堂”的论调，激起网路媒体挞伐声浪。不过，这几天中共官方媒体纷纷跳出来为袁贵仁站台撑腰。党刊《求是》杂志更是连续两天发文力挺袁贵仁。
中国社科院国家文化安全与意识形态建设研究中心，副主任兼秘书长朱继东，2月3号在中共期刊《求是》发表文章，声称袁贵仁的言行是职责所在，遭到围攻的最根本原因是，“这些参与围攻者近年来屡次围攻在意识形态领域敢于亮剑者，并且没有得到应有惩处。”
朱继东还说，“一定要敢于拔钉子，对那些经常发表攻击党和社会主义的言论的教师要坚决清除。”
外界分析，朱继东文章中的言辞，让人联想起中国的文化大革命，“清除和严惩”批评教育部长的学者和教师，等于是退回文革甚至反右时代。
英国广播公司《BBC》，引用香港科技大学教授丁学良教授的观点表示，自从左派政治代表人物薄熙来倒台之后，中国政界、意识形态及有关领域中的这类“吆喝者”，失去了一个重要领军人物，他们发表这类文革式极左言论，正是在做“政治风险投资”。
中国宪政学者 陈永苗：“我觉得中国的知识份子，因为受到文革的迫害之后，在后面对中国所有的问题看的都是很不理性的，都是用惊弓之鸟的心态，然后弓弦一响他们就觉得文革要来了。”
东南大学法学院教授 张赞宁：“我想是不可能的，因为文化大革命不得民心，它是没有市场的，现在在提倡想恢覆文革时期的那种做法的那些人，主要是极少数既得利益集团的人在那里鼓噪，像以薄熙来为主的这群人，当然这个我们不能掉以轻心，现在文革阴魂不散，如果我们掉以轻心的话，也就是文革在中国重演不是没有可能的。”
此前，袁贵仁在一次高校领导人座谈会上说，绝不能让传播西方价值观念的教材进入大学课堂，决不允许各种攻击诽谤党的领导、抹黑社会主义的言论在大学课堂出现，决不允许教师在课堂上发牢骚、泄怨气。
袁贵仁一席话，激起千层浪。
东南大学法学院教授 张赞宁：“我想，这些陈腔滥调在中国是没有市场，现在还有人在讲甚么马列主义、毛泽东思想，但是他一方面又要讲马列主义，一方面又要抵制西方甚么思想影响，其实马列主义就是西方的，这个陈腔滥调根本是很矛盾的。”
对于袁贵仁的言论，北京大学法学院副院长沈岿提出三问，包括如何区分“西方价值”和“中国价值”、如何区分“攻击诽谤党的领导、抹黑社会主义”和“反思党曾经走过的弯路、揭露黑暗现实”、如何让其领导的教育部贯彻执行依宪治国依法治国的方针。
此后，网络上引起激烈争议。
朱继东在文中点名，“三问袁贵仁”的某大学法学院教授，和他同一学院的一位大V教授，是进一步“煽风点火，制造了思想混乱”。
被朱继东隐射批评的法律学者贺卫方2月3号下午，在个人认证微博发声回应朱继东，“不知他指的是哪一位？其中‘屡屡发表攻击党和社会主义的言论’，那些言论？证据何在？”
贺卫方还质问，可否先规定领导人子女不到西方国家留学？
当天晚上，贺卫方再发微博，称发现朱继东“乃当年为薄的重庆模式摇旗呐喊的活跃人物，新华网前记者”，并附上一篇发表在新华网上、题为《专家聚焦重庆“唱读讲传”活动：值得借鉴和推广》的报导，报导中多张照片的摄影和主文记者都署名“朱继东”。
不过，《求是》也承认，袁贵仁的观点并非仅代表其个人，网上一些人表面上看是攻击袁贵仁，实质是藉机表达对中共的不满。
采访/朱智善 编辑/黄亿美 后制/舒灿
Communist Mouthpiece Supports Ban of Western Values
Communist mouthpiece Qiushi (www.qstheory.cn) published
a comment by Chinese Academy of Social Sciences scholar,
Zhu Jidong.
He says the attackers of Yuan Guiren have not received
the punishment they deserved.
Yuan, the head of the Ministry of Education, previously
tried to ban Western textbooks in China's classrooms.
Some wonder if it's another wave of the Cultural Revolution.
Netizens also revealed Zhu Jidong's background.
Much criticism has been seen both online and in the media
on the recent comment by Yuan Guiren, China's Minister of
Education: "No Western textbooks are allowed in class."
But the regime's official media have voiced their support.
In particular, pro-Yuan articles have appeared in the Party
magazine, Qiushi, for two consecutive days.
Zhu Jidong, Party secretary of the Academy of Marxism
of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,
published an article on Qiushi on Feb. 3,
claiming that Yuan was fulfilling his duty as minister.
Zhu stated, "We must dare to 'pull nails'; we must resolutely
clear out those teachers who attack the Party and socialism."
The comment has reminded some of the Cultural Revolution.
Zhu's suggestion to "clear and punish" those who criticize
the minister of education is like going "back to the era of
Cultural Revolution or even the anti-rightist", said the BBC.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Professor,
Ding Xueliang told the BBC that a ringleader of the politically
correct ideology within the regime has fallen along with
the leftist Bo Xilai.
This cultural revolutionary type of extreme-leftist remark
is a "risky investment."
Chinese constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao: "I think
the Chinese intellectuals are irrational on the Chinese issues.
"They have been frightened by the persecution
during the Cultural Revolution.
"A little noise seems to signal to them
the return of the Cultural Revolution."
Zhang Zanning, Professor, Southeastern Univ. Law School:
"I think it is impossible—the Cultural Revolution is against
the people's interest and has no market.
"Those who promote the ideology of the Cultural Revolution
are the very few with vested interests, such as Bo Xilai etc.
"Of course, we can't take it lightly; the Cultural Revolution
still lingers and we must keep it from reoccurring."
Previously, Yuan Guiren had addressed at a forum
of university leaders that no textbooks of Western values
were allowed on campus; no remarks that attack, criticize
or defame China's leadership nor socialism were allowed;
and no teachers were allowed to vent their complaints
or anger on this in class.
Yuan's words stirred people.
Professor Zhang Zanning: "I think these clichés have no
market in China; no one believes in Marxism-Leninism
or in Mao Zedong's Thought.
"He talked about Marxism-Leninism on one hand,
and about resisting Western ideologies on the other,
but Marxism-Leninism came from the West,
so his remark was completely contradictory."
Professor Shen Kui from Peking University Law School posed
three questions against Yuan's address:
How to differentiate between Western values
and Chinese values; how to differentiate between
'attacking Party leadership and socialism' and 'reflecting on
the Party's mistakes and exposing the dark reality';
and how the Ministry of Education would implement
the principle of the rule of law and rule of Constitution.
Vigorous Internet debates have thus started.
Zhu Jidong responded in his article by referring to Shen Kui's
questions, and his colleagues have "fanned the flames
and caused ideological confusion."
Zhu's colleague, law professor He Weifang, responded to Zhu
on Feb. 3 through his certified Weibo account, saying,
"Not sure who he's referring to. As for 'remarks attacking
the Party and socialism', which ones? Is there evidence?"
He Weifang also criticized Zhu, suggesting that he instead
regulate leaders to not send their children abroad to study.
On the same day, He Weifang issued another blog
claiming new evidence.
In a report of Xinhua News Agency, He found Zhu Jidong's
identity as a news reporter, cheering Bo's Chongqing model.
A report by Zhu Jidong with many photos was attached
as evidence.
However, Qiushi admitted that Yuan Guiren's views
were not solely his own; the attacks on Yuan were personal
on the surface, but reflected the complaints of people
against the CCP regime.
Interview/Zhu Zhishan Edit/Huang Yimei Post-Production/ShuCan
